Hearthpwn

maybe we need just the most cheap version of CW. If someone can't afford it, then stick to midrange/pleb C'thun versions.

For many aggro/tempo decks you actually don't need skill or any legenedary. The most important factor is optimised mana curve.

Then you need how to play around most common board clears like flamestrike, truesilver champion or consecration.

Better spend time on youtube how to play specific deck archetype.

And there is a specific point on the ranked where you start facing only top tier decks. At this point you can't experiment with your own decks, just turn on aggro shaman here.

list of majority of top tier decks

Quote from terobero >>

 Tirion - Best paladin legend

Archmage - Freeze Mage / Tempo Mage

Grommash - Warrior finished / minion removal

Really don't understand people who want craft any legendary as soon as 1600 dust aquired.

Save it until you really know what to craft. I wait even a week until validate my lust for a specific card is enough to spend dust on it.

Please do not ask "what to craft", but "i wonder beetwen this and this legendaries. They are worth crafting?".

Ball of Spiders will give only collectibleminions. In standart Webspinner is not collectible card.

I'm exactly the same person as you - 2 years, lot of cards.

All my legendary runs ends after 30 minutes.

I prefer to prepare for my local tournaments, experiment new decks, play Arena or just learn my buddies how to succes hearthstone without big collection.

hitting legendary seems to be very boring and frustrating expierence.

I'm testing decks countering zoolock and aggro shaman. If you want to join me lets meet!

ZiombalaBoms#2785

EU

Quote from yebaba >>

The Majority isn't always right, The troll "Doomhammer" entry was winning page 9 by a lot. (Doomhammer with a legendary gem)

Lets say that your arguments don't convience me and my arguments don't convience you. 

If the topic is not straightforward for all we can refer to democracy rules. If these cards advance to final poll it means enough people think they deserve it even without filling 3.20 lore/flavor/uniqueness restrictions.

regarding High Noon - as a total ignorant of blizzard universe i don't know anything about overwatch. Usually refering to other game mechanic don't deserve my vote, but this time it is more linked with westerns than other game for me. Guess the same logic is applicable for other upvoters of this card.

Quote from nurgling13 >>

I also voted for Wirt's Leg, because it is the epitome of Blizzard self-referential humor. And, I mean, it wouldn't make sense to teleport to the Cow Level twice in one game, would it?

There are some cards that I think have major issues. First, High Noon is overtly just from Overwatch. It's called Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft for a reason. 

Also, as yebaba said, some of the cards just aren't Legendary. Unholy Poison, Extra-ordinary, Steal their Power, Gem of Augmentation, and Holy Talisman are not Legendary subjects in any way. 

Quote from yebaba >>

Some of these spells don't really deserve to be legendary (Unholy Poison, Steal their power, Extra-ordinary etc.)

 

Quote from Nuesschen>>

Don't know if I understand your question right. You only want to know Tier lists for a good Tournament lineup? Or you want to have statistics how good every deck is?

If you want to go pro, you need to make that statistics for yourself. Because if somebody sais he has a certain winrate against a certain deck, it's HIS winrate. The winrate for you in this constelation could be higher or lower, depending how good you play. So to say a Tier 1 deck could be a Tier 2 for you if you don't play perfecly. But a perfectly played Tier 2 can work for you.

I recommend using software that tracks your games and keeps your stats or just start an excel spreadsheet to calculate your winrates. With good data you also can model you expected winrates against some lineups of tournaments in the excel sheet. It's the best way to see your strenght and to learn what is best countering what.

If you just wanted to know good tournamentdecks, look at the European Spring Championship.

Thank you for reply.

I want to go pro :).

I'm already tracking my stats vs certain matchups.

I need estimated win chance from internet to see if my win chance in certain matchup is close to public win chance, or i definietely do sth wrong. For example, as Freeze Mage i feel bad vs midrange hunter. Don't know if it's normal in this matchup, or i should learn something important for this certain matchup.

1. First I write down all decks which i'm able to play/have enough cards:

Freeze Mage, Miracle Rogue, aggro Shaman, Zoo, Midrange hunter.

2. Then I write my estimate win chance for most common tournaments decks.

3. Then i decide that Warrior will be my highest priority ban choice

4. then i decide that i will for sure take Mage and Miracle Rouge.

5. then i decide that aggro shaman will be the best choice for all matchups except banned Warrior.

6. Then fill rest priorities for my ban list.

7. Sadly i'm pretty sure that some of my estimated win chances is not precise enough, so i need to test more my highlighted matchups.

I'm curious about such list in order to create good team for tournament.

I see sth similar to what i'm looking for on Tempostorm, but these numbers seems to be not viable:

https://tempostorm.com/hearthstone/meta-snapshot/standard/meta-snapshot-1-the-new-standard

do you know about sth similar?

Reposting my old idea.

Better Nat Pagle, but blocks the weapon slot.