Hearthpwn

Quote from kizlyar >>

I got mine two days ago :D

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

You know what really sucks? I have played a bunch of Arena runs on EU, my main server, but never made it to 12 wins. I played 1 single Arena run in my Asia server, where I don't really care much, and I got 12 Wins in that run. It's the only thing I'm missing to complete my EU server, and I get it on the Asia server :( .

I want to change my key to 12 wins key instead of 11. I miss it 2 times. Meanwhile, I coach my friends in his 3rd arena run and he got 12 wins.
LOL, 12 key, where are u? XD

I really appreciate that you build your own deck and having fun with it. I myself build a Kazoo lock and reach rank 13 with it, still need optimization in order to increase its win rate! :)
I love innovative decks, experimenting new deck is always fun and at least it's your own toy! <3

I wonder why they nerfed the card. They could have banned him in Competitive and Ranked Play while keeping his old effect and leaving him back to where he belongs: Casual.
Previously, I was mad when I played my Handlock and he was at 1 Health. 1 Twisting Nether and bunch of Healing, back in the game and it was at Ranked play, where skill factor should be highlighted.
Now, i still find him fun in my Mill Rogue but I was not as fun as I played in previous Casual play. The ancestors nailed it: Warsong, Molten Giant,...

I was happy that this card got nerfed. Even if it wasn't nerfed, I wanted it to be banned in Tournament and Ranked play.

You guys want to comeback after a game of bad play? You thought that Mid Shaman at that time was too "cancer" that you want them to be punished? You guys who played Yogg in rank were the one that should be punished. Yogg is made for fun, which means that Casual play should be his place.

My most memerable misplay was in Arena. I was at turn 2 and my hand was full of 4 and 5 drops. I thought that I was at turn 3 and let the Coin out to the Blank Space. I and my friend both sarcastically laughed at that play and he told me that if I used it turn 1 it would be more acceptable! XD

Well, I remember what Lifecoach said when he quit Hearthstone ladder and started playing Gwent:

"...with the nerfs to things like Molten Giant, Blade Flurry, and Warsong Commander—they tend to nerf very skill-heavy decks that reward high skill caps, and on the other hand try to make the game easier to understand and more accessible for the broad masses. It's not necessarily a problem itself, but it seems to me that the development goes absolutely against the pro scene."

Well, at that time, it was right. But currently, do u think that HS goes on the right track or it's just an illusion that they have improved the competitive scene?
I was frustrated that they nerf the decks that I like and stop releasing expansion.
Remember Nax and Blackrock? Those were so good exp and the cards were so fun to built around.

For me, I would like Gang Up to be back to standard since I am a fan of Mill Rogue. Gang Up is so versatile that you can even gang up opponent Yogg or key cards.

Quote from captram77 >>

Quote from TallAr92 >>

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from Vynacio >>

I wonder how many of you guys reaching legend without using decks on such assisting websites or pro players' deck?
For me, my best self-build deck to play was Mill Rogue in Wild. I was able to reach rank 5 with it. In standard, my highest was rank Legend using raza priest that I myself tech cards depending on my meta.
How about you guys?

Im sorry, but ur being hypocritical AF. You took an established deck and teched it yourself vs your meta and that makes it "your" deck? lol ... that is exactly what any sensible player should do, doesnt mean its "your" original deck. I have nothing against netdeckin, but i hate ppl who think they r something better if they change few cards and pat themselves on the back how they made their own "original" deck and then brag about it.

 Was only looking for this post on this thread. Thanks. To think teching few cards is liek creating a new deck one must either live in a total lie or be a moron.

 The problem is pro will start playing a deck, others say it is a net deck from that point on. Even though with 50 million players, who to say they are the net Decker's, going by logic no one is original. 

Not everyone has same collection, so limits it even more.

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from Vynacio >>

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from Vynacio >>

I wonder how many of you guys reaching legend without using decks on such assisting websites or pro players' deck?
For me, my best self-build deck to play was Mill Rogue in Wild. I was able to reach rank 5 with it. In standard, my highest was rank Legend using raza priest that I myself tech cards depending on my meta.
How about you guys?

Im sorry, but ur being hypocritical AF. You took an established deck and teched it yourself vs your meta and that makes it "your" deck? lol ... that is exactly what any sensible player should do, doesnt mean its "your" original deck. I have nothing against netdeckin, but i hate ppl who think they r something better if they change few cards and pat themselves on the back how they made their own "original" deck and then brag about it.

 I was just taking the idea of Raza Priest, I don't like netdecking except it is a really unique and fun to play. And, one more thing, can u name me the guy that invent Raza Priest? I would like to give credits to him since he created the deck that led me to Legend. :)

No, i cant name the guy who first introduced the Raza priest deck, but that is not the point. Its obviously well established meta deck and u didnt just think of that yourself. I have no problem with u (or anyone) using it nor do i have problem with switching a couple of cards to help u in your matches in your meta. I have problem with ppl acting all high and mighty that "they dont like netdecking", that they "only play their own decks" and then writing a post like yours. I dont like hypocrites, thats all.

Quote from NightCrawl3r >>

I think you really need to specify what counts as netdecking and what counts as an original deck

On day 1 of KFT, I made a jade druid with a Hadronox/taunts package and reached legend with it a few days later. There were no lists to copy on day 1 so I built the list based on prior experience with the archetype. You could say I "netdecked" from standard jade druid decks from Un'Goro even though there's thoughtful, key differences in the lists

In early MSG, the face shamans came in two varieties; jade based with jade claws/Aya; doomhammer lists without any jade whatsoever.  I combined the two into a list with jade claws and doomhammer to burn through control decks, cutting the spellpower package, including a spirit claws to make space. To my knowledge, such a list never existed on hearthpwn (and definitely no major tournaments) but I still made legend with it. Is it netdecking?

When I was starting out in the game, I was inspired by Trump's f2p priest run (the one that totally failed in the end). I made a deck like his with the cards I had but when he decided to grind arena for a dragon priest, I kept going with existing control priest list. I bought Naxx, crafted Justicar, spent an absurd amount of time refining and made legend with the deck a few months later. All the changes were made by myself based on what was working for me and my opponents on ladder because I didn't know hearthpwn was a thing. Is it netdecking? Control priest was obviously an existing archetype and there wasn't much special about my list

Does wild count? It's much, much easier to rank there and I reached legend with completely original archetypes in dragon druid and Malorne N'zoth troll druid

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from Vynacio >>

I wonder how many of you guys reaching legend without using decks on such assisting websites or pro players' deck?
For me, my best self-build deck to play was Mill Rogue in Wild. I was able to reach rank 5 with it. In standard, my highest was rank Legend using raza priest that I myself tech cards depending on my meta.
How about you guys?

Im sorry, but ur being hypocritical AF. You took an established deck and teched it yourself vs your meta and that makes it "your" deck? lol ... that is exactly what any sensible player should do, doesnt mean its "your" original deck. I have nothing against netdeckin, but i hate ppl who think they r something better if they change few cards and pat themselves on the back how they made their own "original" deck and then brag about it.

I wonder how many of you guys reaching legend without using decks on such assisting websites or pro players' deck?
For me, my best self-build deck to play was Mill Rogue in Wild. I was able to reach rank 5 with it. In standard, my highest was rank Legend using raza priest that I myself tech cards depending on my meta.
How about you guys?

I think the worst is Boogeymonster since it is a worse Boulderfist Ogre. Millhouse if lucky can outplay zoo decks. Magma Rager can fit to Divine shield paladin. Hemet can kill King Krush. Rend Blackhand can kill Deathwing! :)