I think this is the whole idea of these card games. It's supposed to be a fluid - sometimes chaotic - state where decks are developed to counter each other and evolve as different ideas hit the meta.
I say play as much as your personal time allows for. If you are neglecting your responsibilities, job, family, studies...then it's too much. Otherwise, in my opinion, enjoy!
Personally, I play about 2 hours a day. 30 minutes in the morning and an hour or two in the evening. Some days, I play 3 hours, some days I don't play at all.
I'd still love your feedback, but I ended up taking out a Zombie Chow for a Siphon Soul. Now facing mirror matches and other control decks I'm finding it very helpful to have another removal besides Big Game Hunter. I kept the 2nd Defender of Argus and Ragnaros because I'm finding them too valuable at the moment. However, I would consider taking out Rag for Jarraxxus. I guess I'm wondering, what your reasoning behind the recent changes? Thanks!
Great deck, SkeletalDude! Vote up! Question: I saw your recent changes, which I'm assuming is partly due to meta at where you're playing right now. I still like both Defenders of Argus and Rag in there...if I just take out Zombie Chow, what would be the best change to make? Siphon Soul, Loatheb, Lord Jarraxxus? Also, is there a particular match-up you are changing the deck up for? Thanks! I've gone from 9 to 7 so far and hope to take it to legend as well.
My biggest weakness is not always considering what my opponent may play on the following turn. For example, filling my board to use my mana right before a flamestrike turn.
Well, looks like you've got all the key neutral legendaries. I think Grommash will always be relevant in many Warrior decks, so since you like Warrior that might be a good choice.
Started playing this after getting my butt kicked by it. Any comments on match-ups? Seems to be okay all around because of its combo burst ability to come back.
I was trying to tech for face hunters, but all of a sudden druids came back on the scene, so went back more standard pally. I think if you're seeing a ton of face hunters just change classes, because otherwise the paladin does well against everything else in the meta.
I'm not a great player (Rank 5 is my best so far), but also have a love for Demonlock. I think it will remain viable as it is very flexible and can hold it's own against most of the decks in the meta. I think it's flexibility is perhaps it's weakness, in that it doesn't necessarily dominate any particular match-up but isn't super weak against any match-up.
That being said, I think we need to see more of the new cards to see if there are going to be any synergies that are going to be enhanced. For example, will there be a new archetype (e.g. Dragon) that will be different enough to warrant a change in Warlock's current archetypes. I think this is an interesting thread, but more info needed to make a better assessment.
I commend you for trying to make something a little different, but I think a version of Control Priest is just decent in the meta right now with the preponderance of aggro.
Deck looks pretty good. Only question is what to do with the spot that Sunfury is taking up. I'd actually consider something like Lightbomb (and maybe take out 1 Holy Nova if you were to do this) - great against Handlock and any deck that uses Dr. Boom. With your other board clears, you are good against everything but the fastest face decks that get good early draws. Even against those, if you draw well you can hold your own. Of course, Shrinkmeister or Recombombulator are good, but I find these to be less useful in Control match-ups.
0
I think this is the whole idea of these card games. It's supposed to be a fluid - sometimes chaotic - state where decks are developed to counter each other and evolve as different ideas hit the meta.
0
I say play as much as your personal time allows for. If you are neglecting your responsibilities, job, family, studies...then it's too much. Otherwise, in my opinion, enjoy!
Personally, I play about 2 hours a day. 30 minutes in the morning and an hour or two in the evening. Some days, I play 3 hours, some days I don't play at all.
0
This is a very interesting deck. I don't plan on playing it right away, but I gave it a +1 because of the well written guide.
0
What do you guys think of Emperor Thaurissan instead of Sylavanas?
0
I recently made this change too and so far so good.
0
I'd still love your feedback, but I ended up taking out a Zombie Chow for a Siphon Soul. Now facing mirror matches and other control decks I'm finding it very helpful to have another removal besides Big Game Hunter. I kept the 2nd Defender of Argus and Ragnaros because I'm finding them too valuable at the moment. However, I would consider taking out Rag for Jarraxxus. I guess I'm wondering, what your reasoning behind the recent changes? Thanks!
0
Great deck, SkeletalDude! Vote up! Question: I saw your recent changes, which I'm assuming is partly due to meta at where you're playing right now. I still like both Defenders of Argus and Rag in there...if I just take out Zombie Chow, what would be the best change to make? Siphon Soul, Loatheb, Lord Jarraxxus? Also, is there a particular match-up you are changing the deck up for? Thanks! I've gone from 9 to 7 so far and hope to take it to legend as well.
0
My biggest weakness is not always considering what my opponent may play on the following turn. For example, filling my board to use my mana right before a flamestrike turn.
0
Well, looks like you've got all the key neutral legendaries. I think Grommash will always be relevant in many Warrior decks, so since you like Warrior that might be a good choice.
3
I think Mal'Ganis (and LJ) are key for these demon oriented decks. When I didn't have Mal'Ganis I put in Kel'Thuzad, but really, he is essential.
2
Started playing this after getting my butt kicked by it. Any comments on match-ups? Seems to be okay all around because of its combo burst ability to come back.
0
I was trying to tech for face hunters, but all of a sudden druids came back on the scene, so went back more standard pally. I think if you're seeing a ton of face hunters just change classes, because otherwise the paladin does well against everything else in the meta.
0
I'm not a great player (Rank 5 is my best so far), but also have a love for Demonlock. I think it will remain viable as it is very flexible and can hold it's own against most of the decks in the meta. I think it's flexibility is perhaps it's weakness, in that it doesn't necessarily dominate any particular match-up but isn't super weak against any match-up.
That being said, I think we need to see more of the new cards to see if there are going to be any synergies that are going to be enhanced. For example, will there be a new archetype (e.g. Dragon) that will be different enough to warrant a change in Warlock's current archetypes. I think this is an interesting thread, but more info needed to make a better assessment.
Cheers!
0
I commend you for trying to make something a little different, but I think a version of Control Priest is just decent in the meta right now with the preponderance of aggro.
0
Deck looks pretty good. Only question is what to do with the spot that Sunfury is taking up. I'd actually consider something like Lightbomb (and maybe take out 1 Holy Nova if you were to do this) - great against Handlock and any deck that uses Dr. Boom. With your other board clears, you are good against everything but the fastest face decks that get good early draws. Even against those, if you draw well you can hold your own. Of course, Shrinkmeister or Recombombulator are good, but I find these to be less useful in Control match-ups.