Rank 3 is bad?
- TheFFsage
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years
Last active Wed, Jul, 7 2021 01:21:23 -
- 11
- 45
- 92
- 1 Follower
- 674 Total Posts
- 544 Thanks
-
6
Sh00tingStar1 posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3) -
6
DyingAtheist posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Beating an Amara Priest means pretty much nothing though, given that deck is terrible.
-
4
Twitch1405 posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)I am running a deck like this in Wild, much like the previous comments, this deck is really only favored against warlock, I have to get lucky with Mage/Paladin/Priest.
I have gotten to 14/14 plenty of times with Jades but that is only in control mirrors. this is strong in the retrospect. In wild, I have only added Brann, 2x Hex, and 2x Jinyu. Not running flametongue.
But as a Shaman fiend, I have to say that this is only strong against warlock in this current meta and Jade will be rotated out next expansion but I do play wild! -
2
AUzg posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Well then, post your decks after 10 days. In all probability, this is a very misleading title, and people are gonna craft a deck that will not hold a 60-70, not to mention a 90% winrate.
-
5
AUzg posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Even if the deck might achieve a respectable winrate, I'm gonna downvote it for now, simply because you clickbait likes providing a winrate in the title after less than a 100 games played.
-
-1
krachengeholz posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)I just rekt a Quest priest that summon twice his Amara :) This deck is fun and strong
-
1
Sh00tingStar1 posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Yes, against Priests I have a 3-2 record. Luckily I pulled out before Priests overwhelmed my, But Priest is only countered by Priest :(
-
-2
Sh00tingStar1 posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Aye captain, do you wanna screenshot of my rank 3? Or what?
-
-2
SaltyDawg posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Sadly this deck cannot compete with anything. Going to have to give this a big thumbs down.
-
4
Grumhul posted a message on EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Posted in: EPIC SHAMAN DECK (19-2) (90.47% winrate) (Rank 3)Tried this a lot. The Win rate presented is super inflated. You can feed on Warlocks, but the game against Priests (any Priest probably only Big Priest is favorable) and Secret Mages are horrible. You can win against Paladin, given that you see the right cards at the right time, but you are always under pressure.
The VERY bad thing about this is the complete lack of early game in case you don't open up with Jade claws. There are similar decklists running around, especially Purple's, but it's at tier 3 at best.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
I have only played the 1st chapter. Should I wait till it gets fixed or will it be some shenanigan that I wont get the quest at all and the fix will only gove it to players who did the adventure already
7
But theres Shadow Word: Death offered?
Zephrys will offer you 3 different choices, he will not give 2 similar type of effects. Dunno why would you even want Hex or Polymorph in that situation
2
I think meta is pretty fine except rogue and lackeys. Fuck lackeys and they shouldnt exist
2
This. The gaming community is completely same as those old folks who say "back in my day I used to walk 329797 miles to school"
I think it is a good that we don't have the old ranking system where the grind is 2 times longer from 5 to legend (not counting matchmaking to this). Sure you could argue that this is not a single player rpg or something but a pvp game so the grind should be there. But the issue is that theres so much rng in the game right now. The old ranking system grows worse and worse each time more rng comes out. You win games you shouldn't and you lose games you shouldn't and when the losing part happens a lot it is just a nuisance to grind when you should have been legend ages ago if it was only skill vs skill.
And if you say the rng is 50/50, no it depends what deck YOU are playing. If your deck has minimal rng then the whole rng part is on the opponent which makes it feel even worse when you lose.
1
I'm just gonna suggest some of my favorite games. Could state what the games are like but I'm kinda in a hurry atm lol might edit later
Soulsborne (recommend Dark Souls or Bloodborne or Sekiro)
Final Fantasy (recommend FFX or VII)
Ni No Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch (a hidden gem)
Interactive story telling (Heavy Rain, 1st season of Walking Dead or Detroit Become Human)
Ratchet and Clank (if you just wanna have some fun)
2
Lakkari Sacrifice was my 1st ever golden legendary. I really like the idea of the card but it just sucks that even if you get the quest completed, you need to sacrifice 5 mana for the reward and thats a throw against aggressive decks or maybe even agains a control deck if the opponent dropped 1 decent sized minions which can now got to your face. The discards should be reduced to 5 or even 4 or that the reward is instant but then it kinda goes against other quests cause nothing else is instant
Majordomo Executus. I still have it in my old Quest Priest deck which I haven't updated in years lol
3
Double library as in doubling the deck? This would be way too powerful because
1. Highlander decks run some cards that you wouldn't put 2 copies of into your deck so that alone weakens the deck. And the highlander decks are always normally really draw dependant due to the 1 copy of each card and not that much consistency
2. The effect would only have to be for your opponent. Giving aggro players double the burst is not a good idea. Would be particularly scary in demon hunter
1
A few other examples could be
Ragnaros, Lightlord and Sandhoof Waterbearer
The Mistcaller and Prince Keleseth (both legendary but it still counts imo)
4
Well I only really cared about the card back and free legendary was a plus. If hitting legend gave nothing I wouldn't do it and thats why I'm not gonna do it again cause it gives you nothing but some extra rewards at the end of month you can get normally. And for the info I did in fact get better skill wise and I realised it when I was beating unfavored matchups which are rogue and hunter and those are quite frequent on ladder. But in the end tho legend means very little cause it is just all about the grind unless you get lucky with the rng constantly.
But man, people don't like how others complain how insert deck is broken but positive posts are also disliked? Lmao you do you man
Edit: Saw one of your earlier comments and seems like you quite hate priest. I hate ress priest or any sort of inner fire stuff but a legit control priest is cool
22
After playing this game for over 5 years I finally hit legend. I have only REALLY (meaning as in full tryhard mode) tried hitting legend twice. The time before this was back in Boomsday or Rastakhan using Mechathun lock but I only got to rank 3 five stars with it. So that was my highest rank for ages until this month where I hit diamond 2, then 1 and now legend. At the start I used a deck tracker but then when I started to play more on my phone (which is a screenshot from my phone also) so no deck trackers. I have the mobile deck tracker version but I just didn't like to use.
The best part about all of this is that I did it with a control deck. I always wanted to hit legend with control as it's the archetype I enjoy the most. I used Galakrond Priest no resurrect stuff or Elysiana which some decks run. Whats kind of interesting that I didn't think I could do it at all. Had to craft like 3 or 4 legendaries to make the deck and was sure it would go as it always had gone. I have tried aggro a couple times but even tho you get more games in I couldn't do it with them. The best run I have had with an aggro deck was with token druid at the end of last year where I went from rank 15 all the way to almost rank 4 with no losses but then I hit a brick wall due to the more skilled players and better deck quality.
If the Mage who I faced as my final boss sees this I gotta say thank you for the most epic final boss battle I have ever played. I legit wish I had recorded that game it was insane.
Maybe now my ladder saltiness will go away and I can play without getting tilted as I don't have the focus on getting to legend anymore. I always wanted to do it only once and then never do it again. It was annoying how even when I didn't aim for legend I still had the legend thought at the back of my mind. Now I can do what I enjoy the most and that is playing memeish decks and arena.
Thank you for the kind words friends!