Hearthpwn

I am currently 165 lvl without Battle pass.

Old piece of advice from Dota 2: "If everything is broken, nothing is broken". That is state of wild in Hearthstone.

What is interesting to me, is that new Secret tech that we will get is odd costed (it is first useful odd costed tech against secrets). I am not sure how necessary it is, however i would like to add one or two in my Odd Warrior. It was already strong against Secret mage, however with increased consistency, you can farm them with ease. It is also strong against most of the aggro decks, which makes it perfect for farming the meta. 

I only clear quests and sometimes play battlegrounds, currently i am at 164 lvl. In last reward system you didn't even have skin to pick, so stop crying for God sake.

Why would anyone use old Ysera over new one? Which deck currently use Ysera in wild? You should be grateful that you get new Ysera loaned for free and that you get dust refund for old Ysera so you can actually craft a card that is useful in wild.

Which means that my boi Reno Priest won't be nerfed :)

Battletag: SilverBlooD#21753 

Region: EU

Trade only? - Yes, you go first.

Battletag: SilverBlooD#21753 

Region: EU

Trade only? - Yes, you go first.

Quote from PetiteMouche >>

Maybe in a couple of years.

In this expansion aside from a few support cards with "X spell school have Y bonus or effect" I don't see any layer being added to deck building.

Like you, I always liked the idea of thematic decks for example mages that only play fire, frost or arcane cards, but we aren't there yet in my opinion, there's a lot of synergy that needs to happen if they want people to play such decks.

For instance, Lightning bolt is a nature spell, lava burst is a fire spell. The new shaman legendary buffs nature spells. So you might think it's a good idea to play a lot of nature spells and not lava burst, but the reality is, this is a spell damage oriented deck and you need your lava bursts.

But we are headed in that direction, I suspect in a few years we will get Reno type cards that say "If your deck has only fire spells, do that"

 

 

 

I think that "Lava" or "Molten" cards in their name are actually "Nature" and not "Fire" spells. Mage have Fire, Frost and Arcane spells, however when it comes to Shaman...Shaman have only "Nature" spells. That is why Lightning bolt is "Nature" and not "Lightning" category. It is natural phenomena and as such it is classified as "Nature", just like cards which have "Lava" or "Molten" in their name. I didn't play WoW, so i don't know for sure. However this was my interpretation of it.

I expect great things from Spell schools and they are most exciting thing that was revealed on Blizzcon.

I couldn't care less about Zeddy. He is insignificant person on YT, like all other Youtubers are. I couldn't care less about "racism" and "sexism" eighter, they are YOUR social problems (not mine) and there is no place for them in HS community. 

However what connects all players, no matter if they come from Russia, China or USA is amount of gold we earn in the game. I don't like the route Blizzard is taking and they deserve all the backlash they currently get. If they don't respond to the wishes of players, we will burn game behind with low scores and leave it to the bootlickers who will continue to enjoy playing HS between 10 of them. 

Online games are made for the players, not for companies who made them. The moment they betray players and lose playerbase....they are dead. It is players who dictate what and when, because without them, they can't do anything.

I personally don't respect enough my time, which is why i play still this game. However i also play few others beside this one and i don't feel "addicted" to the Hearthstone, as i once did. That is why i carefully follow every step made by Blizzard, because their decisions can tip the scales on one side or the other. 

Battletag: SilverBlooD#21753

Region: EU

Trade only? : Yes, you go first.

I look at this whole mess like this.

Before when i get 50 gold quest, i would swap it for bigger one, if i get 60 gold quest i would play for around two hours and get 40 gold for my pack and that was my daily routine. I would wait until midnight, play for two hours, get a pack, stay awake for hour or two more and go to sleep. 

I am glad that right now we aren't forced to win and that game is based on time played and not number of wins. Which means that we can enjoy while playing all kinds of decks.

However i am currently around lvl 16 like most of the people that finished their quests and xp needed for next level is 2400. That is a lot, especially if you take into consideration that daily quest give us 800 xp. Which means that i need 3 times the amount of daily quest in order to get a single pack. That is at this rate unacceptable. To make thing worse you can't even see how much xp you earned in battle and you don't even know if you hit xp cap per hour or not (ofc you can go on track and check how much you earned, however will you go back after every game?).

In my opinion there shouldn't be any cap per day or per hour for grinding xp, there should be cap in total, which is 150 lvls worth of exp. If you spent for example 200 hours (random number) of gameplay during one expansion set, you deserve to have all 150 levels. Will you do all that like a maniac in first month or during whole cycle, that shouldn't be Blizzard's problem. After all, player won't earn anything more until next expansion come around. 

Also, i don't care for their excuse for bots. If you can't solve problem with bots without hurting normal player experience, don't solve it at all, because you are retarded and they should exploit you even more.

I don't want to hear any excuse when it comes to "you have also weekly quest, where you can earn xp for levels". When game add weekly quest, they do it in order to enhance player experience by giving them bonus. They don't cut earned xp from daily quests and from that make weekly quests in order to show players "look, here is something new in the game, now play the game and if possible give us money".

I played this game since beta and i know a lot of shit that happened with it during these 6 years. That is why i am still patient and i will let them clean and sort their mess (the same apply with Duels). However even my patience have a limit.

Chat will bring nothing good to Hearthstone, as such we don't need it. I am to some extent salty person when RNG bullshit happen. With chat, if i get triggered with some nonsense, i promise you that i would fuck up everything live and dead around me, including my opponents family (ofc only in words). I know that i am not only one that have problem with saltiness from time to time. As such chat won't bring us any good.

Also with chat people would beg from opponent to let them win a match in ranked, which is both petty, annoying and would take away from competitiveness if players allowed others to enter in high ranks or legend easily. Last night i grinded legend in wild, it took me 14 games from rank 2 to legend. I was 5 times one game away from legend and 4 times opponents crushed me. Imagine that i just begged my opponent to let me win on first try.

If you want Hearthstone to be more social, add friends after the match and play against them or talk to them or whatever.

No. Hearthstone should take away even emote option.