Hearthpwn

a RNG brawl,
is always a GooD brawl,

NOT! :P

Happy New Year everyone! =)

LvL 59, no pass.

just a goldsink.. <3

for me it worth, i like solo adventures like this :)

nice and cheap deck,

thank you!

another RNGclown fiesta.. :P

Draka Frostwolf <3

nice deck,
i had a lot of fun with this one, thank you :)

Pandaria or Legend cardback.

800% value

Doesn't really look like my kind of thing.

Heroes of the Storm died for this...

For those who cant see, the Icon clearly says TEMP. 

I'm upset because I've opened 51 packs since the mini-set and still don't have Long'xin.

I'm upset because if Mercenaries packs work how I think they do, this is only going to get worse and worse the more mercs they add.

I'm upset because since the start of the season, I have yet to beat a human opponent in pvp. No, it's not the losses themselves, but rather the matchmaking. I have a pretty good and fun comp, but have been incredibly unlucky in running into opponents with hard counter comps. That's not the issue; the issue is when I lose to them, the matchmaking just pits me right back against the same opponent 3-4 times before just putting me against an AI.

I'm upset about my 70k+ in excess coins. Yeah, I know a lot of people are and some have it worse, but its been, what, 4, 5 months now and they won't even say what their -idea- for addressing the issue is?

I'm upset because we just had a patch yesterday, and apparently they're paying -some- attention to Mercenaries because they changed an attribute on Yu'lon, but they still left glaringly broken treasures like Positive Equilibrium, even though there are half a dozen bug report threads on it on the official forums. It gives the impression that they have a full team working on Battlegrounds when we see massive updates for it twice a month but only Doug the intern working on Mercenaries.

I'm upset.

Well, I am programmer and I can tell you, that most of the time it's not that easy. Sometimes bugs are caused by very small oversights, such as the lack of a comma or minus sign in a single line of code (among thousands), but sometimes issues lie much deeper, in a flawed (limited) design from years ago, when the developers weren't even aware that some mechanics would be added to the game in the future. Sometimes you have to rewrite an entire system to fix one little thing, which is quite difficult, especially if you didn't design it yourself, but developers before you who don't work there anymore.

OH MY GOD, I already can not wait for the 25 $ Lunar New Year Heroskins !!!!1

Quote from jazzfan27 >>

I thought everything he said made perfect sense.  Not sure why that should count as whining.

 

 Everything he says makes perfect sense if you think that control always has to be top tier viable. That’s not true. And it’s also egoist, since when control is good many aggro decks are really bad. He wants warlock, mage, Hunter and shaman quest below 50% wr, that’s what he stated in his video (he was pleased with shaman being tier 3). But guess what: There are a lot of players who like decks like this and who don’t want them in tier 3. Why should zeddys opinion on this be more relevant then theirs? I do not mind quest decks at all. 

I thought everything he said made perfect sense.  Not sure why that should count as whining.