Warrior is soooo boring to play against, it's like they ALWAYS have armorsmith, fiery war axe, cruel taskmaster and justicar in the starting hand ! (yes even when they go first !!!)
If they have Justicar in their starting hand, then you should be glad, because they got a card that's dead space until mid-game anyway. :P I'd rather have a trusty-bash over Justicar in my starting hand any day of the week.
Haha yeah, I was just venting out because I had just faced 5 CW that got perfect starting hands against aggro.
Warrior is soooo boring to play against, it's like they ALWAYS have armorsmith, fiery war axe, cruel taskmaster and justicar in the starting hand ! (yes even when they go first !!!)
Oh Pandalicious, you got me so hyped ! Now let's just pray Blizzard will release something like that in the future. So far it feels like they are holding back. Why no Death Knight ? Why so many useless cards ? Etc. (money is the issue I bet). The game misses a huge part of Warcraft's lore.
Face damage from hand is not fun to play against. It is either ineffective (priest), or if it is good (mage) then it is non interactive. Mage fireballs are really pushing "stupidly unfun." I don't want to see more classes getting fuel for unfun playstyles to be honest.
Yes but they also allow to create new decks with a class. Priest so far never really had a decent aggro deck (at least not that I know of). I understand your point because I too would be pissed after dying to Force of Nature + Savage Roar for example but it's part of the game, you can't beat everyone. Shifting the meta by adding more decks to it can't hurt imo, right now everyone play decks with the highest WR they can find. Take Priest for instance, you are almost forced to play dragon or maybe control if you are cocky, why can't I play aggro with it? Looking at the current meta flooded with Reno decks and aggro decks, I don't see why that would make any difference to you, it's just more variety.
0
0
Warrior is soooo boring to play against, it's like they ALWAYS have armorsmith, fiery war axe, cruel taskmaster and justicar in the starting hand ! (yes even when they go first !!!)
0
Shaman is sooooooooooo bad right now, just tried 3 different decks in 10 games, scored 1-9... IN CASUAL.
Switched to Aggro shaman, scored 5-1... Go figure.
0
Earrrrthhhhquuuaaaaake !
Next : A boss from MOP.
0
Reno freeze mage.
0
Hahahaha, not quite what I had in mind when I said big drawback but it works ! Hardcore !
I'm french and I'm having trouble understanding your request tho, could you be more specific or use more generic words ? ^^'
0
Oh Pandalicious, you got me so hyped !
Now let's just pray Blizzard will release something like that in the future. So far it feels like they are holding back.
Why no Death Knight ? Why so many useless cards ? Etc. (money is the issue I bet).
The game misses a huge part of Warcraft's lore.
0
Behold ! The Eye of the Legion !
Maybe it should be 4/4 tho.
Next : a card that destroy your enemy weapon.
1
Please guys try to stay on topic and don't skip a post.
0
Blink !
Next : A neutral big minion with a big drawback.
3
Next : A weapon with a crazy ability
0
Evocation for mage. Kinda work as a recycle card.
Next : A warrior spell/minion to draw, it has to fit in an aggro deck, kinda like Divine Favor.
0
I understand your point because I too would be pissed after dying to Force of Nature + Savage Roar for example but it's part of the game, you can't beat everyone.
Shifting the meta by adding more decks to it can't hurt imo, right now everyone play decks with the highest WR they can find. Take Priest for instance, you are almost forced to play dragon or maybe control if you are cocky, why can't I play aggro with it?
Looking at the current meta flooded with Reno decks and aggro decks, I don't see why that would make any difference to you, it's just more variety.
0
It could be an addition to priest if they release Death Knight with runes haha.
Under the mana crystals it would fit I guess.
0
Again, it's just an example, it could be damage to minions.