Hearthpwn

So the first Target is not random which makes this much better since you can guarantee freezing the biggest minion

Though there is a toxfin replacement

Historically it's been random

Quote from Mercynary9 >>

Because that warlock card is old and outdated. Powercreep is real, and reprints can happen too.

Here is an example: My favorite card Electra Stormsurge got now reprinted into druid spell 2 mana (Solar Eclipse) that does the same thing in cheaper cost. Is it unfair that druid card is better than that legendary shaman minion? Sure it is. But Electra is outdated too, so it's reasonable.

 That's untrue. Electra is 1 extra gold for a 3/3. She's not bad just the support for her class was bad

That's untrue. they could release it for approval then hold it until the release date. It's not hard. Not that I think it's the end of the world, just a few more hours till the release and it's expected, not sure why they don't bother coordinating the release though. 

IDK, for a tempo deck 3/4 isn't bad, and if it steals back the tempo lead from paladin which may be the hardest deck for warlock, I don't see why it might not be good. With mega draw warlock is one of the best equipped to have tech, especially tech that isn't a tempo loss. 

Clash Royale, no cap, very competitive extremely high skillcap game. Fast  paced.

Quote from Guymcperson2 >>

Then again anyone accusing people of "virtue signaling" doesn't really have anything of value to add 

 The nature of virtue signaling is that it's an offshoot of privilege in many senses is a natural reaction to the automatic privilege that already existed. Unfortunately it may not be the best reaction but there does need to be adjustment. If you want to complain about virtue signaling you first have to offer valid alternatives to the free pass that the incumbency has.

Omg they came up with a card similar to another card in another game! You cracked the code! 😲

Fallen hero

 Instead of reading it like "pay 5 mana do nothing on turn 5", read it like: "pay 5 mana to cheat out a demon from your hand, it has stealth".

Sure, it can't attack on turn 6, but the fact that you'll have 6 free mana to do any shenanigans with a demon on board that the opponent couldn't remove by any means on the prior turn (no board swipe, no RNG effect - well, I guess it can get Mutanus'd) can be game winning.

May be good in a combo centered meta, like the current one. Will be bad in an hyper aggressive meta, unless you can abuse it with coming back mechanics like lifesteal, etc.

After Blizzard's truly genius balance patch, I predict that all classes will be perfectly represented equally and everyone will have an exact 50% win rate with their deck. Legend rank will become completely empty, as no deck will be able to actively climb ranks anymore. Every win will follow with a loss right after.

The ideal scenario. All things perfectly balanced.

As it was foretold.

I agree a bit.  Disagree a bit.  I think card draw is fine.  But, should be a tempo loss.  Things like Refreshing Spring water that 'can' be tempo gains and draw together are bad.  There are a fair number of cards that can be both draw and tempo together.  I'd love to see those removed and let draw just be draw.  Some cards get synergy to allow them to be both tempo and draw.  I'd like to see this toned down.  Some synergy is fine, but when the focus of the deck revolves around a draw plus tempo synergy that gets problematic.  I guess it is ok for a combo deck that needs 10 mana and 5 cards in hand to go off.   But, I'd love to see it more limited.

I also think mana cheat is fine.  As long as it it balanced.  And I think it really gets worse when draw is easy.  Mana cheat should have a cost.  One cost is often cards in hand, but if draw is abundant and cheap that cost is pretty small.  So,  I think mana cheat is better in classes with little draw.  They cheat something out, if you manage to deal with it, you are then ahead in tempo or cards.  But, if they cheat something out and you deal with it and remain behind, that isn't too fun.  I think that's the problem with those giants and raise dead.  You can maybe deal with that one giant being cheated out.  Maybe even 2.  But, when it becomes 4 you just run out of answers.  Feels wrong.  They are the one mana cheating, so they should be the one running out of threats.  Not you.  So, basically I don't mind an 8/8 on turn 4.  That's scary, but often can be dealt with.  What I mind is an 8/8 on 4, another on 5, 2 more on 6....   It's just too much.  You need a downside to that early 8/8 to give the opponent a chance to respond and recover.

Siamat doesn't tutor 3 cards. I don't think you've thought this through.

Ok, but you didn't realise he can also attack normally, on top of the end of turn effect. Don't rate cards if you can't read.

Yup, you are right, on 2nd glance this is the perfect card for Rush Warrior, insane tempo and draw two Rush dudes. Literally like Siamat and (old) Ancient of Lore having a baby, and it's on steroids.

Nice one. This set is going to be nuuuuts.

Do you honestly believe Blizzard is unable to gather data from their own game?

the hearthstone community is embarrassing unfortunately, the HS reddit proves that with their excessive and endless toxicity.  Shouldn't be surprising there's that kind of thing here, gamers don't want their little boys club challenged, and will bring up a number of dubious point just to keep gatekeeping women.

I made the point in another comment yesterday, but yeah, this is exactly the stuff female players have been calling out not just the past few days but for a long time, in Hearthstone and many other game communities.

The pinnacle for me was comparing inclusiveness to racism. I couldn't think of a bigger slap to the face for both people affected by racism AND sexism.