Whit out knowing the case I would say a response like that does not offer much merit. I does not help enlighten the case in any way. But if you could get more info, do.
BTW Cool card, way to serious a group if it really was the reason
What merit was given in the first place to believe that a card got him banned?
Non, but you are the one trying to dispute it. As I said I do not know of the group, but could be interesting to figure out what perspective there is, especially what constitutes as political nonsense. And to what degree do they tolerate political discussion in the group?
I'm just sharing what the admin said, dude. If you want proof, go join the page and ask there. If you want to hate them because some salty member of the group who got banned came to cry here, just stay here.
Whit out knowing the case I would say a response like that does not offer much merit. I does not help enlighten the case in any way. But if you could get more info, do.
BTW Cool card, way to serious a group if it really was the reason
What merit was given in the first place to believe that a card got him banned?
2
0
4
I don't think it was for the card, bro
6
And if I must further apologize and explain myself, I missed that part. I humbly apologize and ask for forgiveness from everyone here.
0
Yeah, sorry. Wasn't aware you could click to read about it.
0
Can someone explain the "Warm" trigger?
3
Branding, my man
2
Any time you have 10 cards in your hand (Shadow Reflection is a card), the next time you draw you will burn a card.
2
The Bloodmage omission is a punishable offense, though
0
By "all" you mean Chris Metzen?