Hearthpwn

Now THAT is a really good list

Im afraid it cant win against pirate warrior or face hunter tho

1) Faceless Corruptor

2) Kronx Dragonhoof

3) Scion of Ruin

4) Dragoncaster

5) Bloodsail Flybooter

That's really smart

love it !

shaku gonna rotate when DoD come out

Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

There is obviously synergy between the two, but that does not come without a cost. So let's say you do merge the two ideas. You are going to have to cut a lot of the value generating minions or your tempo based battlecry minions in order to make room for the invoke stuff. So you will either be cutting out your late game value generation, or your late game burst options via those battlecry damage minions. 

Lets say you cut the value and go all in on tempo. You're probably going to do very well with the board leading up to your massive galakrond turn. And yes if the 4 8/8s don't get wiped out that is probably the win. But if this fails, the deck has absolutely zero gas. 

Now let's say you cut your tempo, mutates, direct damage battlecry minions. You'll have a much better time again control, but your aggro matchup is going to become severely worse, and your burst reach will be much lower.

Dont get me wrong, I am no psychic. There may be some perfect balance of both that leads to some insane deck, but I feel people forget how small 30 card decks really are. There are going to be a TON of enticing cards to put into this galakrond hybrid shaman deck, and you won't even come close to fitting them all in.

 that dude gets it

Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

Amazing how underestimated this seems to be. 2/1 rush is better than warlocks. It has applications of being better than warriors in that it leaves a body if you don't attack with it. And most importantly, this is tied with warriors as being the best for the early stages of invoke development. This allows you to play those understated invoke minions in the early-mid game while allowing you to help keep aggro at bay. On top of that, two 8/8s with rush essentially says "the board is mine now" save a few situations.

Pretty shocked at the negative reviews on this. Wouldn't be surprised if this ends up being the best galakrond. 

 I don't think it's strong enough to compete with the quest tho

you clearly are obsessed by other's ego but I think the problem here is yours buddy :) 

here you go for your actual evidence :

Quote from EternalHS >>

Quote from SebaMadness2 >>

Quote from EternalHS >>

Quote from Meat >>

you are the inferior deck

Imagine having such a fragile ego that you get personaly offended when opinions of others on cards don't match your own.

Or having such a fragile ego that you had to answer him just because you instantly feel attacked. Go to the salt thread if you can't see further than control warrior and/or you didn't like the card because you can't think about anything else to at least making him work.

Me: Card is bad

Seba: OmG gO tO tHe SaLt ThReAd CONTROL WARRIOR PLAYER!

Hearthpwn has turned into a forest of fragile egos. I'm sorry that illiteracy kept you away from understanding basic forum interaction and what I was saying. I never said that I can't find a home for the card. Invoke warrior! There, home found. I'm saying that what is keeping it from being good is a currently much more superior hero/deck.

1: You did not offended anybody, we are just pissed off by how dumb and unpleasant you are

2: aggro warrior got a better winrate than control warrior , so stop embarrassing yourself with your "superior deck" bullshit

you are the inferior deck

Quote from EternalHS >>

Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

Quote from EternalHS >>

Unfortunately won't see any play outside of niche decks because Boom is simply the better hero card.

 Are you being serious  or is this satire? One is a control hero, one is an aggro. They won't compete for slots in the least bit. 

One is a top tier hero in a deck that has been top tier since the hero's inception.

Other is a 7 cost aggro hero in the exact same class.

Galakrond is much weaker than Boom. Unless it gets busted support it won't overthrow control warrior. Unless you wish to cripple yourself on purpose there is no reason to run an inferior deck.

 you don't understand shit about the game don't you

Quote from Mugen8>>

3 mana pseudo-removal with card draw. Pretty nice, but would need dragon hunter to be a thing

the card is good by itself, and if it's the only dragon hunter have, it will have a higher chance to discover itself

Quote from Shroudb >>

Not sure how viable a concept of "dragon rogue" is. 

With current and revealed dragons, there aren't enough that I would put in a rogue deck to reliably get the effect off. 

 

 I wouldn't be so sure about that, they added and will add a lot of new lackeys generation, and there is now a lackey that discover a dragon. 

Annoy-o-tron :)

Quote from heavensheals1 >>

 

Couldn't care less about this expansion.  Every single expansion before there were at least 1 legendary that I really wanted.  This one has zero that I'm interested in.  No interest at all

 I guess im a part of the problem, but why the fck are you even responding to him ? 

He do not raise any debate, he do not ask for any advises, he just shit on everything like the spoiled 13 yo brat he is

Best thing to do is to stop giving him attention

Quote from AnduinWrynn >>

Damn you warriors, I am not willing to play a 40 minutes game and I am not going to read a 40 minute wall of text either.

 Wish I could like twice