Hearthpwn

Quote from PetiteMouche >>

Quote from CasualPlayah >>

100% win ratio vs mage with weapon rogue ... so dont cry play agrro

 I second this, anyone who hates mage just play weapon rogue

 Sure, and get eaten by paladin. It's not that simple guys, secret paladin destroys aggro rogue (also libram has a pretty good match up).

Easy to say that now, when the pool is just right and the archetype was supported by strong cards, like the 0 mana draw 2. Now, i can say "oh suck it I knew jaraxus was op since he came out 10 years ago", sure as hell now he is viable with a full archetype supporting it. And it's fine, but they designed cards for mage not thinking about this deck in particular. And the fact that is the most unpredictable hi-rolling deck (and least right now) doesn't help the cause. If you feel good about calling randomly a particular card op with no means of knowing that it actually would be, i'm happy for you. But a deck that makes people hit legend playing LITERALLY the green cards that they randomly found in their decks it's just not good for the game.

So, now everyone more or less is playing the lunacy deck. It's a pretty fun deck to play, with a lot of fun interaction and various gameplay. That said, i don't think it's a good card for the game in general. It's not unbeatable but can bring a lot of frustration for both players. With this expansion the power level it's pretty low, games are generally predictable because Blizzard didn't print high-impact rng cards (that's how i feel at least). So, in this meta at least, that card can pretty much win every match-up alone (with some exceptions), and the deck that is built around it it's solid on it's own. Sure it's a legendary card, so 1 copy, right? But that deck has an upstanding card draw, with card discount, and can search for it. Now, as i said, it's not an OP card by any means, but the fact that the match is a coinflip with no possibility of playing around that card really makes me think that it's a problem. Blizzard stated that they wanted less rng\discover in general, but that single card represents the opposite. What do you guys think? Should be nerfed? Removed?

I mean, for me sheep and poison guy with samuro is a cute combo but not optimal (also the broom). You are sacrificing 6 slots for 2 possible board clear at an high mana cost and a ton of cards. So maybe you could cut that stuff. But idk.

I was making a list for this deck as well, and I was thinking to include some synergy with the 5 spell similar to assassinate because we don't have singular removal and with sap out maybe it's good? ( obv depends on the meta). The new 2 spell seems also nuts to kinda control the board a little more, and I think Prize Plunderer × 2  it's a must in this deck because it's a 1 cost battlecry (0 if discounted) and one more tool to board control. Also, Mankrik seems pretty good: helps the 5 spell assassinate like (too lazy to check the name), good battlecry minion and you draw pretty fast so a 3\12 on the board for free can't be bad (also you can shadowstep him few times, pretty good). Also, it can be a second win-con against warlocks, if you shuffle like 3 wifes+ 12dmg from the new 2 spell plus pen flinger dmg, maybe they won't be able to heal fast enough.

The point is that rogue was strong when the expansion came out, it's the only pure aggro deck that draws with half of the cards in the deck. After the nerf of secret passage ( 1 mana draw five btw, the most insane card printed ,in my opinion) people stop  playing weapon rogue (idk why, maybe 1 mana draw 4 was too bad?). But the card that made this deck was Nitroboost Poison, another insane card that skyrocket the dmg they can deal with just 1 mana. So, they didn't kill the class at all, they just nerfed the most powerful card of the mini set BY FAR, making it harder to corrupt and play. Now, with that in mind maybe rogue is hated because they received, in this expansion, 2 broken cards and because we have 1 way to interact wth the weapon (ooze) and, for most decks, few ways to interact with a stealth board of 3\1. So, imagine playing a control deck, that is obliged to play 2 oozes, hoping to draw them with less card draw than the aggro deck.

Now, i don't want to create flame here but, imagine complaining about the battle pass because "now we will make less gold" or "blizzard want us to pay even more". And people continued after blizzard reworked the sistem a bit. lvl 170 btw, with pass, missing a lot of  quests and playing only untill i get legend.

you talked about giving more exp in the pass by events, or lower the exp needed, and that's complaining about the system in general like most of the community does. The fact is that the exp if fine, you have 6 months to finish and go beyond for gold and that's more than enough if you play some games every day. Like in all the games with season pass, you need to play, that's all. For the packs  i can understand your motivations, but for me that reward is a "win more" i: they give you few anyway, you still get plenty of gold to buy what you need or bank it.

Hearthstone community can be so dumb sometimes. After they changed the whole new system last expansion is fine, maybe even good. You can earn gold every week with the quests, even if you don't have the battle pass. I don't play every day, and i skipped some quests, but I'm lvl 160 on the pass with 9k gold in the bank. I'm not a f2p player but i wish to remember some people that f2p used to make gold in arena, slowly building 1 deck to rank. I want to make clear that this game is a CARD GAME, and if you ever played one you should know that you BUY CARDS FOR MONEY (magic, yu-gi-oh, and company). So don't cry like babies every time they try to change something 10 y old for the first time and they mess up a bit. The season pass is good, 20$ for a bunch of skins, aesthetics, cards, packs and even legendary (1 on 25 packs average). Do quick math of that and convince me it's better the old way for a bunch of packs, but maybe most of you came in recent days so i cannot even complain.

Idk, i mean Eccentric Scribe have 0 impact on board when the Ring Matron has taunt. Also one is a demon that can be discounted, tutored, resurrected, and she spawns 3\2 not 1\1 and that's way more reliable. I don't think it's a 1 star card, but that need to be tested.  Also this deck miss a reliable 6 drop.

One question, why should you play Man'ari Mosher in a very reactive deck? i mean the ony target on turn 3 is the spirit jailer. I see the utility in the lifesteal, but you have frangments and broodmothers. Maybe we can add something else. I mean if the meta is aggro you can use that lifesteal for sure, but in control matchup it's a pretty dead card that also make the draw demons spell worst. Idk tho, need to be tested, but with 2 free slot you could add the 6\4 that spawn 2 fire imp, just because i think is soooo good for your waiting room for chtun. Let me know what you think, nice deck.

Oh man, i didn't even think about that. I see you are a man of culture as well.

Nice deck, i love control deck and this seems viable. Against priest seems pretty hard. What about Vectus? if you aim to do the double kargat you could try that. Also against aggro if he takes the deathrattle of Barov seems good, even against control or druid to set the plague. What you think?