This is a pointless question. Should we compare the cards in a vacuum or in their respected decks? Based on value or playability? Based on potential or current usage?
You need to make the title a lot more specific.
- Leo_AM
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years, 7 months, and 18 days
Last active Sun, Mar, 5 2017 08:09:11 -
- 1
- 5
- 25
- 0 Followers
- 7 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
-
Jan 27, 2016Baldassar posted a message on [Poll] Best 6-drop in the gamePosted in: General Discussion
-
13
Sherman1986 posted a message on Is it normal to have erotic fantasies with Aya Blackpaw?Posted in: Card DiscussionNo, it's not normal.
-
3
KitsuneRTC posted a message on The problem with nerfsPosted in: General Discussionat this point, i wouldn't mind an unplayable small-time
-
15
popchansky posted a message on Funny & Lucky Moments #210Posted in: NewsI know there's nothing worthy of posting nowadays, but a fucking Trolden video?
-
18
YourPrivateNightmare posted a message on Funny & Lucky Moments #210Posted in: NewsReally...Trolden videos come out pretty much every 3-4 days now and you decide this is worthy of a post....
I mean, if oyu ant to feature YouTube content than at least pick someone LESS known in order to...you know....make them MORE known.
Everyone and their mother already know Trolden, he's the OG of Hearthstone highlights.
Feature someone like HearthstoneSparkTV or RageOrc at least....even though those should also be popular enough.
I'm not even categorically against it but if it comes out of the blue like this it just seems like you're out of news to post
-
12
Agithore posted a message on Cart Crash at the Crossroads - Tavern Brawl #65Posted in: Tavern BrawlRandom.Random.Random.
Honestly miss construction tavern brawls.
-
11
DarkArchon21 posted a message on This is so boring... No diversity in decks and people only whiningPosted in: Standard FormatThis is why you do Arena and stick to Arena...It's better in every way..
1. Better Rewards 2. Never the same decks. 3. Skill matters more 4. More interesting choices that engages you more instead of same mindless combos done over a million times.
I get my Rank 5 or Rank 10 chest and am done for the month...I can maybe do 5 games max for am ready to puke and stop..Arena is master race,
-
11
FATJESUSONABIKE posted a message on Servant of Yogg-Saron Tryouts - Brawl #57Posted in: NewsWorst brawl I've ever played. Awful lack of rythm and COMPLETELY (and by that I mean 100%) dictated by RNG. There is NO decision to make, you just play cards and watch.
It's fucking terrible I tell ya. -
10
DracoOccisor posted a message on POLL: What deck is the most annoying to play against for you ?Posted in: General DiscussionQuote from robert_fanr >>Quote from DracoOccisor >>Quote from robert_fanr >>Quote from DracoOccisor >>Quote from robert_fanr >>I personally find control warrier the worst because it's not interactive at all.
That deck just stalls time by ruining everything you try to do instead of trying to threat you until you run out of things to do and so you are forced to concede .
You just said "It's not interactive at all but here's how it interacts with you".
Control decks are the most interactive. Aggro and combo have gameplans that TRY to be uninteractive. Best case scenario, aggro and combo hope to goldfish against their opponent. Control decks are the only decks that built their entire deck based on what the opponent is playing. Maybe you were looking for a different word than "interactive".Interaction means fight for board
Warrier does not fight for board at all in until the very end of the game .
Just keeps destroying your threats with spells or weapons . That's no interaction imo .
That's what fighting for board is.Fiery War Axe
Shield Slam
Gorehowl
Bash
Execute
Brawl
Literally any Taunt minion
What kind of control warriors are you playing against that aren't fighting for board control?
The entire point of control is to fight for board control.
I think you're confused as to what interaction means.From everything you mentioned the only thing that leaves the opponent a chance to react is taunt minions .All the other stuff have immediate effect meaning no interaction .So to conclude I consider non - interactive things that have immediate effect .Oh. Hearthstone must be your first card game.
I guess you're entitled to your opinion of defining "interaction" as "creatures fighting each other".
Furthermore, it's my opinion that I constantly move at the speed of light. -
10
DracoOccisor posted a message on POLL: What deck is the most annoying to play against for you ?Posted in: General DiscussionQuote from robert_fanr >>Quote from DracoOccisor >>Quote from robert_fanr >>I personally find control warrier the worst because it's not interactive at all.
That deck just stalls time by ruining everything you try to do instead of trying to threat you until you run out of things to do and so you are forced to concede .
You just said "It's not interactive at all but here's how it interacts with you".
Control decks are the most interactive. Aggro and combo have gameplans that TRY to be uninteractive. Best case scenario, aggro and combo hope to goldfish against their opponent. Control decks are the only decks that built their entire deck based on what the opponent is playing. Maybe you were looking for a different word than "interactive".Interaction means fight for board
Warrier does not fight for board at all in until the very end of the game .
Just keeps destroying your threats with spells or weapons . That's no interaction imo .
That's what fighting for board is.Fiery War Axe
Shield Slam
Gorehowl
Bash
Execute
Brawl
Literally any Taunt minion
What kind of control warriors are you playing against that aren't fighting for board control?
The entire point of control is to fight for board control.
I think you're confused as to what interaction means. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
3