Hearthpwn

Quote from Ophion-EU >>

The Warrior nerfs seem a bit too aggressive, other than that I'm all on board.

 They were all too aggressive and not necessary. Blizzard can never get this right. They nerf one deck only for another to take its place and is never ending. Naga Priest will run wild and get nerfed next. 

I don't understand why Blizzard just nerfs a deck type into the ground only for another to rise up and take it's place. RIP Quest Mage and Garrote Rouge. IMO both nerfs completely unnecessary as Aggro Druid and Face Hunter keep them in check.

Quote from lv426a11 >>

First off - this isn't a salt thread so if all you're going to do is post a reply with a link to the salt thread then please don't bother.  This isn't about one deck or card being OP, more about the general tone of the game.

 

If you have to say " this isn't a salt thread" it is. LOL

Too early to start nerfing cards. The meta is in an interesting place.

Totally agree with you! There are very little down sides. Weapon heavy decks don't want this card. It takes up a card slot but worth it. Could be a bad top deck late game. Most people don't understand how good this card really is! The last down side would be if every one runs Harrison Jones in their deck you're going an advantage to your opponent.

They took the nerfs too far and killed key cards that DH needed to close out games. It was unnecessary and hopefully in the next expansion they will get good cards to make up for it.

I personally don't care about the arena tickets. Basically paying 20 bucks to pick 2 more hero and emotes. If this was a one time fee to unlock all current and future features maybe. Way too of a price point for the little that you get. People please don't support and pay for this. If you want to support the game buy packs.

Quote from EmoGit >>

Bonechewer Vanguard and Bonechewer Brawler have extremely confusing flavour texts.

"Whenver this minion takes damage, gain +2 attack" ... Okay, who or what gains the +2 attack? The minion takes damage and it gains +2 attack? Well it doesn't say it, does it. The minion takes damage and your hero gains +2 attack? Doesn't say specifically that either but that is what I get out of this card. Lastly, this could even mean when your opponent attacks it on his turn, he gains the +2 attack, because it does say, gain +2 attack.

I guess it has the same effect as Gurubashi Berserker but that is an old, old card that doesn't see any play and blizzard have been decent at going back and fixing confusing card texts once the cards get outdated, so I think they should do it in this case as well because having not thought about Gurubashi Bersekrer for a long while, I was really confused when I saw these two new minions. The enrage minions from the past all have "this gains", which makes it clear who gains the attack.

Maybe it's just me but the way these two new cards are worded is very lazy and unclear.

 

 Words mean something. The text does exactly what it says. Not confusing to most people.

People reading is a real things. All of this has been explained if people would bother to take the time to read.

Quote from FortyDust >>

I actually think it's healthy for the game that you get punished for having your entire game plan depend on one card.

You can fight against the tyranny of Theotar by adding another win condition. Even in these paint-by-numbers decks, it can be done with minimal sacrifice.

 It's not. The only decks that have more than one wincon are already T1. Theotar keeps potential (midrange, control and combo) challengers down, it further separates the decks that can afford to play it (because they're so good already) from the rest. That cannot be healthy. 

What Mercenaries should have been.

I think it was made into an article because the deck was created by a staff member (or site contributor). I actually appreciate the insight into a high legend deck in wild that isn’t Hunter or Warrior tbh

i really don't get it, why there is article like this... Waste of time and (mainly) space. There is already different section of Hearthpwn for those kind of articles, called decks.

It is nicely done guide for this kind of deck, but it brings more of negative with putting something what should be elsewhere into main article. I understand, that autor wanted to share some top deck, and it would be ok, if there was not already some similar articles (which have definitely lower quality of work, than this) between main articles. This way it is just wastefull spam on main page.

It does work and may be hard to deal with, but I wouldn't say it's broken. If that deck becomes popular, so will silence.

This fits into any Hunter deck. Insane card.

Dr. Boom for Shaman, I like it

If will be good that depends if this expansion will be able to slow down the meta

Freeze Shaman? Again??? -.-

Let it go, Blizzard! Let it go!!!

If carrot rogue gets axed by this nerf it will just switch to the Pirate OTK version. When will they learn that mana cheating is the real problem we have this year? Can we force people to actually pay mana for their cards? No...? ok...

Blizzard: Sorry for making cards stronger and more easy to use.  Here is dust to compensate for your hurt feelings.