- HenriOsbourne
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years, 11 months, and 23 days
Last active Mon, May, 28 2018 22:01:34 -
- 1
- 5
- 13
- 0 Followers
- 4 Total Posts
- 5 Thanks
-
110
Chimera posted a message on OLD Play A Friend! 5.0Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion -
25
RcCircuit posted a message on ShudderwockPosted in: Shudderwock2015: HEY EVERYONE GET IN-HEY EVERY ONE GET IN-HEY EVERY ONE GET IN HEREEEE
2018: MY JAWS THAT BITE MY CLAWS THAT CA-MY JAWS THAT BITE MY CLAWS THAT CA-MY JAWS THAT BITE
-
1
TheJadedDruid posted a message on ShudderwockPosted in: Shudderwockoh please, i actually made a wild shudder deck of my own build. i never netdeck to win. and i use him for massive jade summoning so i made him more dangerous than what you have seen. if you cant keep up with the decks that are being create, stop whining to us about it.
-
-11
Arachnidius posted a message on New Priest Card Reveal: Twilight AcolytePosted in: NewsI swear the more cards I see revealed the more genuinely I believe that I single-handedly could do a much more interesting, fun, varied, and balanced job of designing an expansion than the entire HS design team, who were employed apparently because they're the best at it. This is a cool card and not incredibly broken by itself, but look at the larger picture. Like lots of people have said already, priest have arguably got the highest proportion of the best cards so far, when they were on top of the meta last expansion and very good the expansion before that. Hunter has got the most consistently mediocre or awful cards so far, on average, and hunter has been the worst performing class for the last expansion or three. If you're going to put OP cards in to a class, SURELY it should be hunter? SURELY it makes an incredible amount more of sense to put some of the weaker cards in priest? And SURELY to do more like I say would make a great start at rebalancing the meta and thereby refreshing it and massively increasing Hearthstone's appeal and longevity, and to do the opposite is to massively increase the likelihood of imbalance, salt, monotonous and unvaried top-tier decks, etc.? You might argue that it's because they have some larger vision in mind which we obviously can't be aware of at the moment, but I would have a very hard time believing that shitting on hunter for about the third expansion in a row will somehow be beneficial to hunter in the long run.
-
2
DivineDemonicDragon posted a message on Developer Insights Live - Year of the Mammoth Q&APosted in: Newseverything is just meow
-
3
Benny24 posted a message on One Night in Karazhan is Hearthstone's Fourth AdventurePosted in: NewsI can watch the cinematic over and over again. The best cinematic so far :) my favourite scene is the gatsby mediv, looks like in the movie
https://images.jacobinmag.com/2013/05/515e61e2c2337_gatsby5.jpg
- totally awesome great work blizzard, hope the card will be that good too.
-
2
TheAvatar4321 posted a message on Giant Sand WormPosted in: Giant Sand WormShould have had 4 attack and charge.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
If only it had "it gains its stats and its effects", would be way cooler.
2
actually there is 4 common instead of 3 for rogue, lol. and 4 rares for warrior instead of 3. lol²
It's all revealed then.
1
I think it's missing a rogue rare and a warrior common card.