Hearthpwn

Battletag:  done
Region:  NA
Trade Only?:  Yes

Battletag:  DONE

Region: NA

Trade only: yes

Battletag:   DONE

Region:  NA

Trade  only:  yes

Battletag: done

Region: NA

Trade Only: Yes

I dont know if the deck still being good for > rank 5. But I did it to rank 4 without problem (maybe around 70% winrate)*, switching between Zananan's deck and this other one. Probably both was equally strong but I felt that the second one was stronger and definitly easier to play. Currently there is a more refined version of it.

*That was before paladins got popular, so I dont know how strong these decks are atm. After reaching rank 4 I tried Midrange Hunter and, because I have been playing only zoo since my beginnings in HS (february), I enjoyed a lot this new deck; first deranked to rank 5 zero stars again, and now that I am getting used to it I am in rank 3 atm

Sorry for being rude, but your 30% is way below the average zoo  player (45% win rate) showed by Vicious Syndicate stats; so you cant say that you are a good zoo player with those stats, when a good player will have more than 50% win rate with it. Experience says nothing about your skill in the game, I saw a lot of old players complaining about being unable to reach rank 10 or even rank 15 (ever). So if you want to say that you are skilled dont talk about experience, talk about your achievements and wich deck/decks you played to do it.

In another hand, if you where that wise in hearthstone as you say that you are, you should know that this is a card game (lucky based) and even good players can have a lose streak with the best deck, especially if we talk about a pure minion deck that relies a lot on the inicial hand. So "couple matches" is not a valid sample to say if a deck is good or bad, or neither to say that you are a bad player (as I stated above).

About quest rogue, is only faster if they start with a very good hand and you with a bad one