Hearthpwn

I agree that this card is crazy, but in standard there aren't any good combo decks at the moment(maybe spell druid), so this card mainly punishes the created by Meta(Priest/rogue/kinda warrior/kinda paladin). It will probably hurt wild quite a bit, but they rarely nerf cards for wild so I'm not sure how hard this will hit standard to merit how hard it might get nerfed. Part of aggro's game plan is not spending mana on drawing cards(which Skull of Guldan does) and here you do spend the 4 mana...  Running this in your deck will make you a counter control deck which makes you weaker to aggro so it has a downside. I do wanna see this card in action, I do wanna see how it affects the Meta... I'm tired of some things just being flat uncounterable.

but on the other hand I'm a control player so I hope there are some powerful cards to help make it not an all aggro meta.

Sure this is good.. its not a 5 mana 7/4(highly aggressive statline) deal 4 damage to minion or face(flexible)... but its decent. I don't foresee this getting nerfed nor does it need to be a Legendary...

Just feel a little lack luster as a legendary when paladin has that new 3 mana 4/2 divine shield rare with spellburst, regain divine shield.. which means it can technically perform 3 value trades while this 4 mana legendary can only perform 2 trades, the 2nd one being RNG. Even if it gets support, I don't really think I would want to support this.

Welp, this is extremely unbalanced... When a hero power can solo you in 5 turns...

I'm fairly sure it was only 3 different hero powers throughout the 21 different fights? For me that's really disappointing. And it once again proved that demon hunter cards feel like adventure cards... I don't think I relied on those rescued minions at all. Overall very boring, they need to go back to dungeon runs but keep the flavor of the rare encounters and extra difficult enocunters...(the treasure room, the fishing boss, the trap room)

I personally feel rogue is currently much more annoying, the amount of time they spend discovering things and taking long thought out turns is on average double the amount of time a priest takes in a turn. Constantly on the board with little minions and cheap removal, lasting til turn 7~9 with much more ease then most and then its swing turn after swing turn after swing turn with usually 7 zero cost cards.

Good= They tried something new and showed they could be responsive in much better time than in the past

Bad= They've made the classes reliant on having really strong base sets to be viable. Showing that Demon hunter(Especially, Rogue, Warrior and now Priest have better tools then other classes for control, tempo, and aggro. Some classes are now nonviable mainly due to no card draw or lack luster card generators. Most of the neutrals they introduced are boring and almost all classes are class cards unless highlander... And an Extreme lack of healing and almost all healing affects aren't worth their cost at all.

^ Zephrys only knows the card text for doomsayer I believe and evaluates deathrattles based on the cost of the card its attached too. all other effects are completely unknown to Zephrys. So the 6 damage end of turn effect is not taken into calculation and therefor you do not have visible lethal.

I agree, I recently had to cave just for 2 cards(Amazing Reno and Risky Skipper)... bought the whole boring expansion for 2 cards.. Rather unfair. Had to spend over an hour just to get to play with them too, its really bad business all around.

Bomb Warrior only makes up like 1% of the decks you will currently face :/ Especially a strict bomb warrior...

Quote from Star_Forge >>

HoF him. It's time.

 Yep.

It's not just about one powerful turn, however.

It's about the fact that Rogues have been doing essentially the same turn for nearly seven years.

That's just too dang long, and things should change.

And yes, Edwin rather than Shadowstep, since Shadowstep does a lot of different things many of them new and interesting as the sets shift, but Edwin only does one boring thing.

He is a strong class. But there are stronger classes with higher win/rate. For example, Paladin and Hunter. So, no. It should't be nerfed. It is fine in this way. If you have issues against them use some tech card (ooze, Harrison Jones, taunts, heals, divine shields, etc..)

And yes Aggro must exist. Be happy about it. Otherwise HS would be made only by combo decks, since without the aggro's existent would be also pointless the control's existent. 

Does anyone else not give a damn about the ranking either and just concede once or twice until you get a fun hero power? No way I'm gonna pay 20 bucks just to get 2 more options to pick from.

Uninstall

Weapons are problem.

Weapons are crucial for Warrior, DH, Shaman, Paladin - the most popular classes right now. We even have weapon resurrection card. Yet anti-weapon cards are so bad even in this meta, they are rarely played.

Quote from Tandem21 >>

I've done the Tickatus/Brann combo a couple times now, and I do agree as much fun as it is to disrupt combo decks, it's far too easy to pull off and just wins you the game on the spot many times. Not to mention leaving your opponent likely really salty. I don't get much enjoyment out of disrupting decks that don't rely on combos either.

I don't know how to modify this card, however. The effect needs to be changed completely. A mana adjustment isn't enough.

 I think making Tickatus an 8 mana 8/8 actually solves the issue - not really any card currently in that deck would corrupt it (technically Y'shaarj would but then you can't play it tickatus twice

You could play Alex (some decks already do) maybe Y'sera, maybe rabbit, maybe collosus... you get it... it would force you to play an un-ideal card and basically leaves you with just one way to corrupt it so it's much harder to have both in hand... so yeah... I think there is a way a mana adjustment would be enough 

Hello everyone , after the release of demon hunter the same has been nerfed multiple times but it still is to me one of the most powerfull classes in hearthstone right now, I don t know why but the playstyle of the class or the cards in its toolkit seem very unfun to me , for example , your playing midrange or control whatever , and you play a decent taunt with or without buffs , on the demon hunter turn its like 100% likely they are going to silence it and draw a card ( for me the most op card in the kit since it can even be get from wandmaker ) or bypassed by kayn or just removed very easily ( ex : DH gets a lot of atack and then plays Blade Dance and obliterates your board because lets be honest , no one builds a board against them except maybe paladin right now ) so my question is , should it be nerfed ? Or am I being unfair to the class since agroo must exist as much control and midrange do ? Thank you all for reading and best regards.

DH is ridiculous. Cheap removal ie blade dance? Check. Insane healing? Check. Insane burst damage? Check. Crazy card draw? Check. Cheap silence? Check. Class literally has it all. Nothing involves but pointing face and stacking burst damage. One of the biggest mistakes was Introducing this class.

Yes it’s nuts