I don't mind netdecking, but this is ridiculous. You just named 6 cards out o 30 in a deck, that leaves you with 24. Put in some must have class cards and exert your brain to squeeze out whatever creativity it can muster for synergy and u'll have a deck.
No wonder people hate netdecking, because there really are players who netdeck without knowing why the cards are in there.
Heck, OP can't even be bothered to go to the right subforum to find information.
A new term needs to be coined. The act of posting a thread asking for a netdeck - Netbegging.
2
I used this list and also got 12-2. Thanks for the assist!
2
Happy Easter, hearthstone has not risen!
3
I subbed out one faceless for a raging worgen for a second win condition. Just got a worgen, inner rage, charge, faceless combo for 32 damage
3
I've played many variations of mill and this is by far the best. The complexity of this deck is vast. You WILL fail if you focus to hard on your coldlights, your strongest card in this deck is your healbot for most matches (gang up gives you a potential for 64 points of healing throughout the match!) . To play it correctly you will need to anticipate what your opponant plays and adjust your style accordingly.
That being said it's viability is still in the air as the Meta is still shifting, this will be a hard counter to chromaggus. It's going to be an interesting few weeks folks!
1
You could still run ancestors call to bring out malygos
2
My bad! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFo6ZfbNnZI&sns=em
2
He is bugged...
proof: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PFo6ZfbNnZI
3
I'm partial to King krush, terrible card as far as legends, but I like how he affects the entire board During his entrance.
2
Congrats on your first forum post though!
2
You're wrong, it's a new meta you'll figure it out soon, relax a bit, remove the salt, move on.