Hearthpwn

 I still hope for a mode that's a bit more interesting this year. But it's a good change.

fixing how far people drops (especially top ladder/legend players) helps a lot.

But, I still don't think it will make ladder more enjoyable to play.
Are the rank floors still around?

Can someone tl;dr what Kripp said. I don't watch him, and I don't see a summary or link in the OP.

Why do you think someone posts a thread like this every single format. So many "punk ass bitches," amirite?

http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/28947-group-therapy-need-to-blow-off-steam-mega-salty?page=2202#c46988

Quote from Horkinger >>

The only Thing that is necessary for a secure win is Patience on both sides. Then you will eventually have a 120/120 windfury minion and two times heal 4 hero power. You can only throw the game with abysmal luck or a moron that Plays the key Cards (divine Spirit/inner fire) too early or on minions which are going to die.

I am pretty sure that the only thing that the Fiery War Axe nerf truly hurt was pirate warrior. Control Warrior isn't good right now for a host of reasons largely unrelated to FWA.

Quote from GameTheory345 >>

Quote from RequiredFieldNameTaken >>

Quote from WhatAChamp >>

No. Even though it had one of the top meta decks mere months ago, there is absolutely 0% chance that warrior will ever have a T1 or T2 deck again. Five years from now, nobody will even know about the class and nobody will be even playing it in casual. No expansion will cause any improvements or changes whatsoever.

 

for posts like these i am following you, keep them coming XD

 That's not necessarily true. Remember, back before Un'Goro, Priest was Hearthstone's little battle dummy. Now, they're dominating with their own Razakus trash. Hearthstone is such a cyclic game, there's no possible way that the class "will be forgotten and nobody will play them five years from now". I don't know WHAT game you're playing, maybe you're just salty over their domination in the meta recently, but your viewpoint is flawed, and you're essentially flaming at this point.

 

The hardest part about this Brawl besides bad players is the hand swap.

Quote from MProdigy >>

How to win? it cheats everytime.

This feels like an arena deck.

Some people have been moderately successful with Exodia Paladin.
AAECAZ8FCNwDkAfdCom0Ap29ArnBAo7TAuPjAgv7AfQF9gfZrgL6vwKzwQLfxAKIxwLjywLt0gL40gIA

A guy named Adernain made legend with a Midrange NZoth build
AAECAaToAgikA/IF+gbgrAK5wQKIxwLt0gKO0wIL+wHcA/QF2a4Cm8IC38QC48sCps4C+NIC+9MC6uYCAA==

Quote from Kla_guy >>

Man, we appreciate your efforts and your good intentions. But until you do a better job of communicating the meaning of your stuff, there's little point in all of this. All your series of posts and videos share the same shortcomings, sorry about that.

• Your English is bad. I know you're somewhat aware of this, you said it somewhere... but maybe you don't realize the extent of the issue.  It's not just an esthetic thing, mind. It's bad to the point that it's often hard to understand what you're trying to say. For example, WTF means "I thing this cards are mo powerful in the game for same period"?  You're not a native English speaker, I get it, but jeez! Neither am I, so what? That's hardly an excuse. IMHO you should either improve your language skills, or consider to quit publishing these analyses of yours.
• While building your model, you can devise some terminology and that's ok, but if you do, you should also explain it. For instance, what is "Last Period of full Frozen Throne meta time"? Is your Period a month (like ranked play season), a week (like the frequency of VS reports), or something else? Oh, wait, maybe you meant Position, like position in last ranking? That would make some sense, since now I see your Lps range from 1 to about 60, and new cards have an Lp of "-". But mate, why do we have to reverse-engineer your writing, in order to understand it!?
• Your Mathematics is unclear. Your 5 points give only a vague, qualitative description of what you really do. Actually, the tone of your discourse seems to use Math as a buzzword, whose sole presence should be enough to justify just about anything. You might as well say "For Science!" like they do in the comic Girl Genius, or even "It's Magic, baby!" like a B-movie character. No sir, some of us aren't impressed by the mere word math, can actually do some of their own, and could even evaluate your job (if given the opportunity). So why don't you describe your algorithm in more detail, give us some formulas, etc.? Afraid to be refuted?

OK, maybe this came out harsher than it needed to be. Again, sorry about that. But felt that somebody had to tell you this, for your own good, and the community's, too.

Good luck with your endeavors.

 

 

bad. Just play the priest version. It's much better.

The light will burn him! Because of the way HS works, it probably will.

But I do have some concerns. A lot of decks may still do "warrior things" better than warrior:
-Rogue will probably still be the better tempo deck.
-Paladin will be the better hyper aggo deck, especially with the rotation of the Pirates.
-Warlock is probably the better control deck. (Voidlord>basically anything the warrior has).
-I think Druid legitimately competes for the better armor deck.
-It still has a bottom tier Death Knight.

There are some niches for Warrior though.
-With Jade gone, DMH Fatigue is more intriguing.
-With Barnes gone, Recruit is an interesting "cheat big things deck".
-With Raza gone, Taunt Warrior becomes a more attractive "inevitable burn" strategy.

I don't think it's the decks' fault, m8