One more thing is that people tend to forget that Illidan guarantees going first. Heck, not only going first, but having two attacks before opponent even starts. And yet Illidan is considered a bottom tier hero. Yeah, this thread is typical bias. Someone lost a game due to going second and they think it's an issue, while it's not.
hell not only does he get 2 first attacks immediately but his first attacks go before other start of battleground effects like Nef's fire and whelps...by the logic of this thread he should be ultimate top tier
Then come up with a solution that will be fair for everyone instead of being an ass. You can make people who fought themselves previously have fixed order of attack (if in the last battle you attacked first, now they do). But in fights between players who haven't battled before there's no other solution than a coin flip.
If you are player A and fight player B, C and D, each for the first time, and every time you attack second, it's fair.
Just further developing this idea
it could be useful if 2 players each are assigned A, B, C, or D at the start of the game, which alternates each round, A moving to B and B moving to C, C to D and D to A
A and C always attack first, and that way battles could swing like tides
Also the less minions rule could still apply here which adds some earlier strategy?
help me further develop this and then blizzard can actually have some useful feedback
I'm assuming of course Illidan would superscede ALL of those...then again if you going first is that predictable it would almost make Illidan's ability borderline meaningless
hell not only does he get 2 first attacks immediately but his first attacks go before other start of battleground effects like Nef's fire and whelps...by the logic of this thread he should be ultimate top tier
I'm assuming of course Illidan would superscede ALL of those...then again if you going first is that predictable it would almost make Illidan's ability borderline meaningless
Illidan's ability literally is attacks first though