(with Emerald Spellstone I mean 12/12 of stats for 5 mana, yea...it's obvious isn't it?).
People always get this wrong. It's 12/12 of stats for 9 mana, not 5; over 3 cards, not 1. Without paying the 4 mana worth of secrets, it is literally just 6/6 of stats for 5 mana.
Uhm...yes...you play two secrets before. But then it's still 12/12 on turn 5.
And if you didn't have 2 secrets on the previous turns? Put it this way. How are you going to get your 12/12 of stats for 5 mana if you were given 5 mana to start and just this card?
So secrets have 0 value for you? What if wandering moster summons Mukla? Is there a requeriment to play the secrets the same turn as the spellstone? Does the secrets have addional sinergies, like a weapon that increases its durability? No, it's not 12/12 for 9.
You shouldn't try and put words into people's mouths like that. It's sloppy debating. I never said secrets have 0 value. In fact, I said the complete opposite. I said they cost 2 mana each. Which you need to pay to make the Spellstone provide 12/12 of stats.
Tell you what, if you can show how you can get 12/12 of stats on turn 5 with the Emerald Spellstone without playing any secrets beforehand (on this or any other turn), I'll accept you are right. Otherwise, you're simply wrong. The secrets dont even have to do anything. They could literally do nothing at all. But you still have to pay the cost for them to get the spellstone value.
(with Emerald Spellstone I mean 12/12 of stats for 5 mana, yea...it's obvious isn't it?).
People always get this wrong. It's 12/12 of stats for 9 mana, not 5; over 3 cards, not 1. Without paying the 4 mana worth of secrets, it is literally just 6/6 of stats for 5 mana.
And if you didn't have 2 secrets on the previous turns?
Put it this way. How are you going to get your 12/12 of stats for 5 mana if you were given 5 mana to start and just this card?
You shouldn't try and put words into people's mouths like that. It's sloppy debating. I never said secrets have 0 value. In fact, I said the complete opposite. I said they cost 2 mana each. Which you need to pay to make the Spellstone provide 12/12 of stats.
Tell you what, if you can show how you can get 12/12 of stats on turn 5 with the Emerald Spellstone without playing any secrets beforehand (on this or any other turn), I'll accept you are right. Otherwise, you're simply wrong.
The secrets dont even have to do anything. They could literally do nothing at all. But you still have to pay the cost for them to get the spellstone value.
People always get this wrong.
It's 12/12 of stats for 9 mana, not 5; over 3 cards, not 1.
Without paying the 4 mana worth of secrets, it is literally just 6/6 of stats for 5 mana.
Football and Soccer ARE the same thing. It's called "Football".
*hides*
"I, for one, welcome our new Meca'thun and OTK Overlords..."
No, scratch that. I really don't. This new meta is going to be hell now that OTK decks are going to run amok. Sigh...