The data will not likely match your experience in the game since they have tons of data while you might only have a few games a day. You need to play hundreds or thousands of games to come close to it.
To answer your question is hard as it is subjective. Personally I think it’s not really that important, but the mulligan stats can be pretty useful. Also its a fun tool overall.
I also get the same feeling that Im not facing the decks that I should face according to the data, but it is what is is. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
It's all about sample size. If you add up all those percentages, that means roughly 75% of the games are different decks. Statistically you would expect to see at least one or two zoolocks with 17 games, but there's not a guarantee that you will. It's just how statistics works - come back after 170 games and you'll see numbers closer to what they see.
That said I'd probably agree that it isn't worth paying for the premium service. I think you can get by just fine with the free VS reports.
Yeah I believe it's more sample size than anything. You only played 17 games. I find the hsreplay quite helpeful. I got close to rank 5 this season with Recruit Hunter but then hit a wall. Tried the new not thing with heal zoolock and was able to hit 5 then hit another wall with that deck. Looked up hsreplay and saw odd rogue #2 overally but T1 and switched to it and got to rank 4 (even though I'm not good with Rogue and don't like to play Rogue in general).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
So last month I finally spent the money and got the Premium service on HRSReplay. But now I am questioning if it is worth anything.
According to their 1 Day Meta stats, at Rank 10,:
9.38% of games played were Zoo Warlock
6.88% were Shudderwock
5.9% were Even Warlock
5.05% were Odd Rogue
Out of 17 games played today, I have not faced a single one of these decks. Not one.
I have played 6 druids, most being Taunt
4 Paladin
4 hunters
3 Shaman, all Even.
Not real sure I am going to renew my subscription when it is over.
I wanna glide down, over Mulholland
I wanna write her, name in the sky
I wanna free fall, out into nothin'
Gonna leave this, world for awhile
Did you filter for your rank and region?
The data will not likely match your experience in the game since they have tons of data while you might only have a few games a day. You need to play hundreds or thousands of games to come close to it.
To answer your question is hard as it is subjective. Personally I think it’s not really that important, but the mulligan stats can be pretty useful. Also its a fun tool overall.
I also get the same feeling that Im not facing the decks that I should face according to the data, but it is what is is. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
It's all about sample size. If you add up all those percentages, that means roughly 75% of the games are different decks. Statistically you would expect to see at least one or two zoolocks with 17 games, but there's not a guarantee that you will. It's just how statistics works - come back after 170 games and you'll see numbers closer to what they see.
That said I'd probably agree that it isn't worth paying for the premium service. I think you can get by just fine with the free VS reports.
Yeah I believe it's more sample size than anything. You only played 17 games. I find the hsreplay quite helpeful. I got close to rank 5 this season with Recruit Hunter but then hit a wall. Tried the new not thing with heal zoolock and was able to hit 5 then hit another wall with that deck. Looked up hsreplay and saw odd rogue #2 overally but T1 and switched to it and got to rank 4 (even though I'm not good with Rogue and don't like to play Rogue in general).