Hey everyone! My in-game name is DBmob and I'm about to revel to you a new project I am working on. As the title says the name of the project is Community Packs. What is this project you ask? Well, it's all started when I watched a youtube video of someone opening 50 packs and he wrote down the statistics of how rare is to get legendary and the I thought to myself that this statics isn't really that good because it's only 50 packs. In order to get a really good statistics you need to open a lot of packs like 1-2 thousands or even more. This is an insane number of packs and there is no way I will be able to open that much in a short time so this project was born! If you guys want to help me out and make a really good statistics to show how rare (in %) is to get golden shaman legendary or how not rare is to get neutral rare then I invite you to join this project! I opened an excel shared document on Google Drive that everyone can view him but in order to not mess it up only I can edit him. This is the link to the document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZR-kGKL7pU5YDFnyuQWiz4Qg_t9fzsLzK4yO7H1-0o0/edit?usp=sharing
If you would like to help me out all you need to do is to send me pics or written description of any packs you open (and not only the good packs you open in order to get a good static) to this email: packsstatic@gmail.com For any other question replay here or send me an e-mail :) I really hope that a lot of people will join this project. Have a nice day and thanks for reading!
I would suggest only taking bulk submissions. There are many people who would like to post their "Golden Legend, Legend, Epic, Epic, Rare" packs cause that is all they care about; while forgetting to post all of the "Commonx4, Rare" packs they get.
While people may still skew the bulk submissions (Submitting data when they get 0 legendary cards from 40 packs, when they get 4 legendary cards from 5 packs, etc.), I still think that it will be less skewed than people talking about singular packs they opened. Just my 2cents.
I would suggest only taking bulk submissions. There are many people who would like to post their "Golden Legend, Legend, Epic, Epic, Rare" packs cause that is all they care about; while forgetting to post all of the "Commonx4, Rare" packs they get.
I agree with this. Maybe require submissions of the last 5/10/15 packs opened per player before adding anything to the spreadsheet.
I would suggest only taking bulk submissions. There are many people who would like to post their "Golden Legend, Legend, Epic, Epic, Rare" packs cause that is all they care about; while forgetting to post all of the "Commonx4, Rare" packs they get.
While people may still skew the bulk submissions (Submitting data when they get 0 legendary cards from 40 packs, when they get 4 legendary cards from 5 packs, etc.), I still think that it will be less skewed than people talking about singular packs they opened. Just my 2cents.
I would suggest only taking bulk submissions. There are many people who would like to post their "Golden Legend, Legend, Epic, Epic, Rare" packs cause that is all they care about; while forgetting to post all of the "Commonx4, Rare" packs they get.
I agree with this. Maybe require submissions of the last 5/10/15 packs opened per player before adding anything to the spreadsheet.
Ok thanks for both of you! I will take this to my attention. I hope you both will look at this project once a while and hopefully will send me data as well ;)
Hey everyone! My in-game name is DBmob and I'm about to revel to you a new project I am working on. As the title says the name of the project is Community Packs. What is this project you ask? Well, it's all started when I watched a youtube video of someone opening 50 packs and he wrote down the statistics of how rare is to get legendary and the I thought to myself that this statics isn't really that good because it's only 50 packs. In order to get a really good statistics you need to open a lot of packs like 1-2 thousands or even more. This is an insane number of packs and there is no way I will be able to open that much in a short time so this project was born! If you guys want to help me out and make a really good statistics to show how rare (in %) is to get golden shaman legendary or how not rare is to get neutral rare then I invite you to join this project! I opened an excel shared document on Google Drive that everyone can view him but in order to not mess it up only I can edit him. This is the link to the document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZR-kGKL7pU5YDFnyuQWiz4Qg_t9fzsLzK4yO7H1-0o0/edit?usp=sharing
If you would like to help me out all you need to do is to send me pics or written description of any packs you open (and not only the good packs you open in order to get a good static) to this email: packsstatic@gmail.com For any other question replay here or send me an e-mail :) I really hope that a lot of people will join this project. Have a nice day and thanks for reading!
Ambitious project, but very cool! I'll bookmark this for later and send you some data when I'm done buying Naxx with gold...
I would suggest only taking bulk submissions. There are many people who would like to post their "Golden Legend, Legend, Epic, Epic, Rare" packs cause that is all they care about; while forgetting to post all of the "Commonx4, Rare" packs they get.
While people may still skew the bulk submissions (Submitting data when they get 0 legendary cards from 40 packs, when they get 4 legendary cards from 5 packs, etc.), I still think that it will be less skewed than people talking about singular packs they opened. Just my 2cents.
I agree with this. Maybe require submissions of the last 5/10/15 packs opened per player before adding anything to the spreadsheet.
Ok thanks for both of you! I will take this to my attention. I hope you both will look at this project once a while and hopefully will send me data as well ;)
Well, so far according to my statistics it's 1 per 6 packs. That's why I need more data, to gain a better statistics.