I genuinely don't know. I've been playing "midrange" hunter these past few weeks, but either my games end on turn 5 because my opponent didn't draw any removal for my hyena or I lose because there are 7 taunts on the board. In a metagame that is so polarized, I feel like midrange decks on ladder just can't win, despite theoretically being the most well-rounded decks.
Hardly, it's really polarized. I don't knkw about standard, but in wild you're either dead by five or you're bound to play for 20 turns.
Exactly. In wild it feels like you have to play aggro or control priest. I thought I was going to really like wild, but I find it very annoying. Midrange and control that is not named Anduin does not seem to have a chance.
I actually have been enjoying standard. I have a few different decks that are doing okay. Faced soooo many murloc pally's today.
I genuinely don't know. I've been playing "midrange" hunter these past few weeks, but either my games end on turn 5 because my opponent didn't draw any removal for my hyena or I lose because there are 7 taunts on the board. In a metagame that is so polarized, I feel like midrange decks on ladder just can't win, despite theoretically being the most well-rounded decks.
Hardly, it's really polarized. I don't knkw about standard, but in wild you're either dead by five or you're bound to play for 20 turns.
Midrange huntard and pally seem fine to me.