You'll need to mulligan for execute to have an answer to the giants or brawl as the giants slam down on 3/4 you can stall abit with taunts and then jam brawl to remove them. Its not the easiest MU for sure yet its around 50-55% vs Cube/Even imo
Depending on the Line ups he might ban Cubelock or not the quest warrior can surely beat cube but then again there is skull into 4 demons which is pretty good overall. Obviously Owl is not better than Ooze in this MU but in generell you are more likly to see Taunt Druids then cubelocks in this meta so thats where the tech pays off. think the MU rly depends on the opening turns and on how fast you complete the quest. approx i would say 45/55 to 50/50 with ooze
You don't have many free spots in the deck and slam is a good activator / cycle card for sure yet with the amount of low cost cards and ww effects I prefer battle rage as you normaly get 2+ cards out of it.
Yeah I went top 10 with it on EU. Indeed Fullface decks like Paladin are insanely favored in the Match Up but 5-23 holy moly I'm still at a 65%+ winrate with this deck vs full aggro just mulligan away the quest and prey :P
Faceless feels often even more useless than Ixlid does I know he looks ultra shitty on paper but even if you go like Ixlid into Arakkoa or Creeper to do the quest or stall its perfectly fine while faceless feels only good on malygos also i dont wanna pull Faceless with Oaken Summons.
0
You'll need to mulligan for execute to have an answer to the giants or brawl as the giants slam down on 3/4 you can stall abit with taunts and then jam brawl to remove them. Its not the easiest MU for sure yet its around 50-55% vs Cube/Even imo
0
Thanks for the gameplay video and happy you enjoy it I added the video to the post hope thats okay for you cheers!
0
imo play a different build azalina does a lot of work in this deck and I wouldnt replace her.
0
Depending on the Line ups he might ban Cubelock or not the quest warrior can surely beat cube but then again there is skull into 4 demons which is pretty good overall. Obviously Owl is not better than Ooze in this MU but in generell you are more likly to see Taunt Druids then cubelocks in this meta so thats where the tech pays off. think the MU rly depends on the opening turns and on how fast you complete the quest. approx i would say 45/55 to 50/50 with ooze
0
You don't have many free spots in the deck and slam is a good activator / cycle card for sure yet with the amount of low cost cards and ww effects I prefer battle rage as you normaly get 2+ cards out of it.
0
Dry + owl + Flurry + Hp fits in one turn Spellbreaker doesnt also 2 drop+owl+brawl is possible.
And the body isnt rly important in any MUs
0
When complaining about such things atleast name the creator of the deck :^)
2
Yeah I went top 10 with it on EU.
Indeed Fullface decks like Paladin are insanely favored in the Match Up but 5-23 holy moly I'm still at a 65%+ winrate with this deck vs full aggro just mulligan away the quest and prey :P
3
Wouldn't play it without kun he resets your mana way to important to replace imo.
2
Sure :)
0
Faceless feels often even more useless than Ixlid does I know he looks ultra shitty on paper but even if you go like Ixlid into Arakkoa or Creeper to do the quest or stall its perfectly fine while faceless feels only good on malygos also i dont wanna pull Faceless with Oaken Summons.
0
About 100% if you face alot of aggro you just cut Dark Arakkoa and play two times Fatespinner I wouldn't cut Paths its just too good.
2
Yogg is always worth craftng probably one of the best legendarys atm.
2
Sure.
0
Thanks for the Gameplay buddy.