I feel like The Secrets of Alchemy would just promote a really unfun control warlock that does nothing but stall until it hits some insane value card.
Voted for Romulo
In wild you could summon 7 ragnari,ragnaroses?? (I dont know the plural of ragnaros) and that would probably end the game right there especially if you shadowflame one of the ragnari because that would most likely clear the board leaving 6 ragnari to go face thats 48 damage, THATS A LOT OF DAMAGE (Phil Swift face)
Well in math there is this number i that is the square root of -1 since it is imposible it might not be even or odd so if we get a card with cost i it is neither even or odd
5
This in weasel priest with bwonsamdi fill your hand with 3/3 weasels
0
Anything to replace shaw with
0
In wild you could summon 7 ragnari,ragnaroses?? (I dont know the plural of ragnaros) and that would probably end the game right there especially if you shadowflame one of the ragnari because that would most likely clear the board leaving 6 ragnari to go face thats 48 damage, THATS A LOT OF DAMAGE (Phil Swift face)
0
Removed
0
I would have thought that of all people you would have seen the difference old friend
0
That would be busted but that is what he means i think
0
I think he meant with different hero powers than the normaal ones
9
So at what time do you stream
7
This is not a new brawl i am shure we have had this brawl before
1
Yes
0
Well in math there is this number i that is the square root of -1 since it is imposible it might not be even or odd so if we get a card with cost i it is neither even or odd
0
I think we wil get a mean streets of dalaran expansion this year look at the second expansion in the teaser there is no other way
0
100% winrate to rank 1 legend
0
It is treason then
0
I thought your wincondition was was triggering your oponent so hard they die of salt poisening