Wouldn't a world without net decking be a world with one person playing each deck? Honestly, most higher tier decks don't have many flex slots and for the most part decks build themselves. For insurance, you aren't going to find someone playing yeti instead of shredder, that would just be using a worse card in the four slot. And faulting sometime for playing the best cards of every class is foolish, druids will run combo, hunters run kill command and highmane, everyone runs boom. Playing decks that are 'original' usually means tossing the rules of deck building out the window, which can be fun and novel bit you certainly can't fault someone for wanting to be competitive and Pau decks with high success rates.
Hey guys, I would love to help with the testing process. I religiously use deck track and the innkeeper app whenever I play and really enjoy what you guys are doing already.
I like the suggestion, as a magic player, but as a hearthstone player it doesn't really work the same
Due to deck/hand size constraints decks rely very heavily on certain cards and a card that did something like thoughtsieze or slaughter games from magic would render hearthstone combo decks obsolete. In magic you have the deck space to diversify your threats, this is seen perfectly in splinter twin a deck that merges control, aggro and combo making it one of the best decks in the modern format, that simply can't exist in a game with 1. small decks 2. small hands and 3. no duplicate effects from cards (in the way that twin runs kiki and splinter twin)
I like the idea of random discard though, having something that says "your opponent discards a random card" would be really cool and would add some diversity to the game. In a game where card advantage matters so much they would have to be careful to always make it reciprocal (1 for 1). A card that, for instance, said "your opponent discards two cards" would become the best card in the entire game.
0
Thank man, fun deck!
0
Wouldn't a world without net decking be a world with one person playing each deck? Honestly, most higher tier decks don't have many flex slots and for the most part decks build themselves. For insurance, you aren't going to find someone playing yeti instead of shredder, that would just be using a worse card in the four slot. And faulting sometime for playing the best cards of every class is foolish, druids will run combo, hunters run kill command and highmane, everyone runs boom. Playing decks that are 'original' usually means tossing the rules of deck building out the window, which can be fun and novel bit you certainly can't fault someone for wanting to be competitive and Pau decks with high success rates.
0
Hey guys, I would love to help with the testing process. I religiously use deck track and the innkeeper app whenever I play and really enjoy what you guys are doing already.
0
Worked perfectly for me, first try
Thanks!
0
what is the brawl this week?
0
I like the suggestion, as a magic player, but as a hearthstone player it doesn't really work the same
Due to deck/hand size constraints decks rely very heavily on certain cards and a card that did something like thoughtsieze or slaughter games from magic would render hearthstone combo decks obsolete. In magic you have the deck space to diversify your threats, this is seen perfectly in splinter twin a deck that merges control, aggro and combo making it one of the best decks in the modern format, that simply can't exist in a game with 1. small decks 2. small hands and 3. no duplicate effects from cards (in the way that twin runs kiki and splinter twin)
I like the idea of random discard though, having something that says "your opponent discards a random card" would be really cool and would add some diversity to the game. In a game where card advantage matters so much they would have to be careful to always make it reciprocal (1 for 1). A card that, for instance, said "your opponent discards two cards" would become the best card in the entire game.