You should be able to crush murloc decks with battlecry. I am 20-2 this tavern brawl with battlecry shaman that runs double hungry crab(which is ok even vs non murlocs), elven archer, mc tech and storm, which are all cards that are not situational in any matchup, and should always find value.
- cdig
- Registered User
-
Member for 9 years and 3 months
Last active Sat, Feb, 3 2018 15:27:19 -
- 1
- 4
- 18
- 0 Followers
- 135 Total Posts
- 96 Thanks
-
1
taurenchieftain93 posted a message on The problem with this Tavern BrawlPosted in: Tavern Brawl -
4
pidanmonk posted a message on Most Popular Decks of the Week, Deck Spotlight: Spark's Anyfin Mrrgglrglr, Dr. Boom and the 7+ Mana AlternativesPosted in: Newsmost of the time blizz nerfs cards its to much so i think small nerfs should be done like make him 7/6 and make the boom bots deathrattle 1-3
-
1
Almagnus1 posted a message on Why is the world championship so convoluted?Posted in: General DiscussionIt's a response to the last year's tournament, where you'd have one deck sweep an opponent, which happened with quite a few matchups.
By forcing the victor to play all three different decks, it requires them to be good with three different decks, rather than being an amazing one trick pony, with a couple of other decks that they are passable with.
I love the idea of conquest. I have an issue with 2 different double eliminations rather than a single double elimination tournament.The reason I think the current system is dumb is because either of the following can happen: a) you win every match up until the finals, and lose, coming in second place with only a single loss. b) someone can have 2 losses and still win the whole tournament, by having only 1 loss in the group phase and then coming from behind to win in the finals. The winner of the tournament can lose twice to the runner up.The opening weekend tourney also allows Blizzard to figure out what the final bracket should look like, to ideally allow for the most interesting final bracket, ideally letting the two undefeated players go at it in the finals, rather than having two undefeated players go at it in the first round of the Blizzcon stage of the tourney.Keep in mind that a lot of players are getting mixed together, so nobody really knows who's the actual best player, and this double elimination stage provides about the fairest way to figure that out.That said, I'm still gonna gonna cheer for the NA players, as we're the best =P -
15
DjobiDjoba posted a message on What hearthstone announcement would you like to see at blizzcon 2015?Posted in: General DiscussionIn-game Tournament Mode.
-
13
Epica posted a message on BlizzCon 2015 Developer Interview Question RequestsPosted in: General DiscussionNo shady answers please. Be clear and straight-forward. The ranked meta is dominated and plagued with very fast decks and aggro is ruling all over the place after TGT failed to deliver on slowing the game a little. What is the internal opinion of the hearthstone team about this, and is this gonna TRULY change or not?
-
5
Rafoel posted a message on What hearthstone announcement would you like to see at blizzcon 2015?Posted in: General DiscussionIn-build tournament system, like the one in Starcraft.
-
3
Sinti posted a message on BlizzCon 2015 Developer Interview Question RequestsPosted in: General DiscussionWill next adventure/expansion finally take arena into acount? Especially rarity of the cards, with biggest focus on commons?
(i know, they already made a statement, they will do something about it, i just want to know, if its gonna be taken into the account in next released content already or not) ;-)
-
16
Agithore posted a message on BlizzCon 2015 Developer Interview Question RequestsPosted in: General DiscussionWhen will we get more deck slots?
-
3
ScaryKoolaid posted a message on Upcoming Balance Change to Warsong CommanderPosted in: General DiscussionWell, while I'm neither a Patron player nor one of the people calling for a nerf I think this change is flat out stupid. If they wanted to nerf Patron Warrior they could have done it far more elegantly than making Warsong Commander actually unplayable.
The two easiest and more elegant fixes would have been either re-wording her to say "Whenever you play a minion with 3 or less Attack, give it Charge." which would have disabled all the Patron clones from being hasty; or, to say "You minions with 3 or less Attack have Charge." which would have disabled Frothing Berserker OTKs and disabled the initial Inner Rage or Cruel Taskmaster fueled Patron, but left Patron still able to multiply the turn he drops.
Either of those likely would not have completely destroyed the deck as you could still cobble together a strong combo, but the deck would need a bit more meat than "Cantrips/draws + combo pieces". Now, I don't even know what Warsong is for - I guess face-warrior with a bunch of Charge dudes? -
63
HalfHalf posted a message on Weekly Card Design Competition #35 - Submission Topic [Ended]Posted in: Fan CreationsDruid secrets are usually something more akin to 'where they hid all their acorns for the coming winter.'
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
Because we are passionate, love hearthstone and want to talk about it all the time.
1
Great work man. The only card that doesn't work is shatter. If you silence a minion, it is no longer frozen. Is your intent to prevent death rattles from triggering? Maybe consider "destroy a frozen minion, its death rattle doesn't trigger."