Hearthpwn

1) achievements - i want more of them. Getting a golden hero after 500 wins is great but what happens after 1000 or 5000 wins? 

2) i hate to see cards nerfed into oblivion and never see play again. Fiery waraxe, warsongcommander, charge went from the best cards to the worst cards. FWA was THE BEST weapon in a class where the weapons should be good and now paladin, hunter and rogue have even better weapons - it's a joke. Warsongcommander was a way to combo in warrior but not anymore - it's so bad. So there is that instead of nerfing cards like crazy give us a middleway where fwa could have deathrattle gain 3 armor or just something. I liked how the roguequest was nerfed. First one change and looked how it goes and was still to strong so it got nerfed again. 

2.5 now this is a bit to the above but wild has some serious problems wich i want fixed. First it should be more accessible. Second i see classes like priest, warlock or paladin all the time because they have or got better cards over time than warrior. There is a reason why warrior gets those good cards in arena because all other cards are bad. Give warrior some love pls.

3 archetypes that are getting pushed should work after some expansionreleases. Enragewarrior after all this time still not viable?! 

4 the cost is just way to high for what you get. Was disappointed in rastakan so i will not prepurchase the next expansion. 

5 more skillbases games where just pressing the heropower over and over isn't rewarding

6 listen to the community by making some surveys. Ask what decks you play, what classes you play, what decks you liked to see, what cards you feel bad about, what ccards you love, what cards should be nerfed, what cards should be buffed or reverted, what archetypes you like or would like to see and the list goes on...

now i took my time not even knowing if anyone reads this but i hope you do and make the game better and again nerfing cards that were loved is horrible when they are not played anymore. Warsongcommander could be reverted and put into wild and i think it wouldn't even be that great and that sais something^^

You're a joke 

-new achievements 

-orc tribe

-warrior to have a tempodeck (heropower is holding a tempodeck down tho)

-nerfed cards that were and arent any problem anymore to be reverted or some kind of buff to cards that donmt see play at all (classcards)

-divine favor to be hall of famed, inner fire to be nerfed and something that makes the classic classlegendarys be played more often. 

If that happens i'll quit hearthston. What the fuck is wrong with you people?!

all those cards were fine till baku and genn came into the picture. Anyway warrior has a terrible earlygame. Fwa got nerfed and then brawl?! Warrior has the worst base set because everything got nerfed so stop that shit an make my fav class better again. 

Quote from Nohva >>

Grabbing popcorn and watching this post get shredded.

 same^^

A good company is when 'thinking people' who try new ideas and creat innovations are in buissness - not when employes who only care about the money.    

kinda strange asking what class you like to play the most and then offer us decks in the poll. I personly don't like warlock but i love renolock so there is that. if you ask me what class i like the most theme based and all that around it would be warrior. for me not a single class can come close to the flavor warrior has but warrior lost a lot of flavor by losing charge, warsong and fwa... hope team 5 will realize that nerfing cards isn't always the only aproach. i like shaman too another class fuckedover. i play wild so unfotunatly warrior is just bad and i really hope that team 5 can even things out a bit more like in standard...

Nerfin cards so they don't get autoincludes is fine - nerfing cards to oblivion so they never see play really pisses me off. Flametongue is on the brink of beeing unplayable but then there are other cards that will never see play again. I understand that hearthstone or any cardgame needs bad cards but if you have a class that has a weaker base strength then other classes is problematic. It's frustrating ...

The perfect meta is never gonna happen. Right now there is some problem revolving baku and genn. What really pisses me off is when arcetypes get pushed and pushed but just aren't viable. Deathrattlerogue, rushwarrior or buffwarlock. I think what is very imporatant is that all classes have more than one good deck. Look at shaman and warrior. every time you que up to these decks you know what you will be playing against before mulligan. Although we had druidstone and hunterstone i liked it when i didn't know what deck they were playing. Knowing that you play against a certain deck just because that class has one deck isn't fun..

 keep on voting !!! =D

i have made an edit on my first post because i unfotunatly posted to early without copleting my whole text. 

Now i know there are a lot of things to consider here. 

This poll is not the most relyable source because only dedicated hearthstone players are entering this page so we have a manipulation of what the majority thinks blizzard should do because most of hearthstone players are casual players...

never the less i would love to see what you lot have to say. i like the hearthstone communtiy altho the saltyness is real - where isn't it ?

Now i would like to give you my own thoughts about this topic;

Core set or classic set it a question that was considered a lot in this community and perhaps favored i don't know at least i think a lot of hearthstone proplayers would love to see this change. would it be better or would it make things worse. another question that can't be answered in generall because some things are working better with a classic set and some thins would be better with a core set...

first lets start with the classic set;

Pro:

the classic set is great for new, f2p and casual players. the reason behind this is because players can rely on this set all the time. Not only that but also they know the cards so when they come back they know these cards still exist and can come back the way it was with some fresh air from expansions. The other part is that the balance team has the same foundation with the classic set. they know witch cards are problematic when they design new cards. 

contra:

the classic set is the same alll the time - it doesnt change a lot except for some nerfs but thats the problem. when designing new cards the developer team has to look at the classic set and sometimes realize they cant do these cards because it would be abused like crazy and it would make the game unfun. 

players that play almost every day don't feel like they have a lot of change except for expansions but then agains from expansion to expansion we see the same cards all the time...

Now to the core set and why it would make more fun in my opinion whitch may not apply to all;

pro:

the core set would make the game feel fresh all the time. The developers could manipulate the "foundation in standart" how they want. A few month we let malygos go to wild and thaurissan would come back and another time we bring back slutch betcher and let a few removal cards go to wild. 

the other part is your cards would have a lot more value because cards you bought are coming back to life in standart. i'm a wild player play standart as well but the value of cards would be far greater if those cards have a chance to come back in standart. 

the core set can still be bought like the classic set but if you have a full set of classic set like now you might have a chance to get new cards witch would be great imo. also a lot of players might have a chance go move into wild more often because they can access the cards they don't have in wild better.

cards don't have to be nerfed that much because they can say look we saw that this card is making a lot of problems so we will put it into wild exlusivly and bringing it back next expansion...

contra:

New, f2p and casual players might have a difficult time catching up witch the change. some might even think if this is a new game and quit right at the spot who knows but perhaps some are eager to find out whats going on. 

the balance team has more work to do becuase they have to take in more thought what cards they would like to see in standart in the particular time piriod and perhaps have a difficult time doing so but then again try it out and if the card seems to be a problem they can tell us that it's going back to wild and another card is coming back to standart. a lot of change constantly that might be a problem

i know it was a long pro contra blablabla but i tried to bring in my thoughts and hope you liked this post. i see the saltyness coming hahaha. nevertheless i would love to see this change but it takes a lot more then the community to say what they want that we can see a change. perhaps i'm wrong and a lot wouldn't like what i'm saying because they like it the way it is right now. 

Anyway i would like to see your thoughts on this topic or perhaps another solution. write in the comments and vote!

DON'T DO IT would be my first answer.

now do you want to play competitive and have a problem waiting for a greater collection ? Then do it

if you want to go for the save side and think you might find an archetype in another class that you would like a lot then just don't do it. I loved highlander priest but i hate all other priest decks. I hate warlock but i love renopriest. I hate mage but i love evenmage. So here you can see that perhaps you don't like a class but a certain deck can really apealto you... again don't do it but in the end it's your choice..;)

As a warrior main i like to play odd warrior to i would love to see some viable tempowarrior. Not piratewarrior but tempowarrior. I waited for this arcetype for one year and although they hvae seemed to try that they completely failed. Give me a fiery waraxe or something similar. If anyone says it would be an autoinclude whatever. We have autoinclude card in almost any deck. Just give warrior sime decent tempocard like 2 mana 3/2 give your hero +2 atk this turn. Or a 5 mana 5/6 draw a wepon. I don't care just make tempowarrior viable in standart and if possible in wild. Controlwarrior is fine but tempo is something i'd love to see. We have multiple archetypes in all classes except warrior and priest. Pls just pls

Altough i would like to see blizzard buffing some horrible cards i don't think this is going anywhere. I'm looking at cards like silver patriarc and similar cards. Yes scurgelord garosh is probably the worst DK of all classes and it could of been done better but i'm talking about the cards we will never see play. Maybe a lot of people don't have a problem with that and thats ok because everyone should have theyre own opinion but cards that don't see play and especially when they're class cards it's a waste of cardslot. Sometimes they were bad at release or sometimes they were bad because of a nerf that destroyed a card so bad that it's not played at all ...

will we ever see that? I'd hope but thats all we can do but i still doupt they will because it's to much work for them :/ sad but what can we do we're mearly customers;P

S rcharge really that overpowered? Now i know it is strong but it it were that overpowered it would be played way more often. The reason team 5 nerfed charge is because you cant interact with charge and you can win the game by having nothing on the field. Well umm that doesn't make any sence because there are so many decks that give a fuck about their board and win anyway. What's the difference losing against a leeroy then a fireball? Well spells you can interact even less because you can have taunts against charge minions and spells don't care about it the only reason i see is that with chargeminions you deal the damage and have a minion on board for more pressure. The problem isn't charge - the problem is that we don't have enough cards that counter other cards by nature. I'm not talking about techcards really but others that naturally deal against a certain playstyle/ archetype. Is animal companion to strong? Noo but hunter is and then animal companion seems to be in the radar. If you want to nerf cards then nerf the other sets but not the classic set. We've seen it with worrior and now druid. Destroying a card witch is a core card and so iconic to a specific class is devastating and simply wrong. Yes warrior was to strong in the days so where druid now but exchanging a card from good to horrible is not the way you should implement a change. Change a card slightly and see how it goes. I rather have nerfs like roguequest then stuff like corridor creeper. It's lazy destroying a card so you dan't have to care about it anymore ... 

i play wild a lot and i can tell you that those 25$ are worth it. You get a lot of very good cards proven in the past. Just to mention a few of them: Mad scientist, haunted creeper, zombie chow, deathlord, sludge belcher witch are used very often and are neutral cards and then some class cards like avenge, death bite and voidcaller. So in my opinion i would really consider getting the adventure but then again there is league of explorers witch have very good cards as well. If you want to play wild and like it and have no problem spending i would buy nax and league of explorers cause yes lotheb is a great card but if you would like to play another deck in wild and have a dust problem buy nax and maybe league of explorers. i bought them both and they made a huge difference in my collection.