• 0

    posted a message on Thing from Below and Even Shaman

    Damn i would liked that dislikebutton here. No really why do people not play wild i don'tget it. Yes if they don't have enough cards i get it. Wild is as important as standart. Why you ask? Well if the wild format is complete shit then the history of hearthstone is gone. All those cards blizzard created are gone and all decks you liked to play are gone. So when you get a card from a pack you can only use it for 1-2 years witch is a short piriod and then all those cards would be useless and have less value. The wild format keeps the value of these cards a little bit. 

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 1

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad

    I don't have a problem that they nerfed it but how they nerfed it and at what time

    yes they have done some good nerfs like dark pact and lackey or simmilar stuff perhaps but then there are nerfs like warsong, fwa and now this. Although cards like these were very powerfull and had to be adjusted in some way they had no reason to destroy those key iconic cards. It's very easy to nerf a card when you destroy it because you don't need to take a lot of effort. Most cards nerfed costed 1 more and what we see is pretty simple. A 5 mana spreding plague was nerfed to 6 mana but still got played - it was around 25%increas of manacost witch is somthing but people still payed it because it was still powerfull. Berfing a wild groth or fwa from 2 to 3 mana is huge. Imagine you changed spreading plague from 5 to 8 mana - not really good anymore aint it? 

    Wild growth could be changed to gain en empty mana cristal next turn. Fwa is from the best to one of the worst weapons in the entire game! A weapon class! Deathrattle gain 2 armor.

    it's not that there shouldn't be nerfs but nerfs should be done carefully witch they sometimes succeeded and sometimes not. I don't care much about druid but i still feel for the druidplayers cause i understand as a warriorplayer

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on blizzard suppport

    there is a point to that one haha - i think it just casts more shadow surrounding blizzard because they wouldn't even care - i've sent 2 web tickets and 3 times tried it with blizzard chat :S

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on blizzard suppport

    So i went into the battlenet shop and my credit card expired so i deleted the old one and tried to add the new payment method but it just doesnt work. so then i tried to get the payment manually when purchasing but then this came: 

    Zounds an internal error has occurred. try again a bit later ....

    so then i tried it a bit later and it still didn't work - i tried to contact blizzard but none responded. Does anyone have problems to cause i would like to buy the wild bundle :S. If anyone has any suggestions i would be glad for any. Thanks for the help;))

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Wild Bundle pack opening

    anyone else have problems with payment ? i cant pay the bundle or any packs in hs at all and i have enough money on my creditcard. does anyone know something i don't know ?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on tempo Warrior ever gonna work ?

    before withwood i was very hyped about a tempo warrior. Not aggro nor control because that's what i'm playing in warrior anyway - control here control there and i enjoy it. Then witchwood came out and the rush mechanic game along and i was happy. Very good or at least decent cards. The rush deck got a lot of  experimentation but after some time it lost in popularity witch is fine because an archetype can't be build with only one expansion. Then boomsday came out and i was really happy that warrior got a new hero - i was very hyped but after that the rushwarrior did't get much better so i waited for the next expansion RR and i was hyped for the weapon sul'thraze. Now it's been a month since then and i couldn't make a warriordeck besides controlwarrior. 

    Enragewarrior was pushed for ages - never worked

    rush/tempowarrior is a thing but after 3 expansions rushwarrior is not even tier 2 it's bottom tier 3 and i wanted to ask if anyone else would like to see  a good tier 2 tempowarrior?

    For those who don't know the difference between tempo and aggro it's that aggro doesn's care about recources but looks to get as much power on the board or burn as fast as possible whereas tempo curves out minions in the best possible way to pressure to board and do favorable trades. 

    i waited for tempowarrior for a long time and enragewarrior was something i played at the start when i was a newcomer but it never worked and i would love for these archetypes to work - what do you lads have to say about this? 

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Odd Warrior vs Exodia Paladin

    That otk is an easy win but the one with uther is the problem not with shirvalla...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Odd Warrior vs Exodia Paladin

    Yes - the quest is your only chance but then still your gonna have a tough time. As a warrior main i don't have a problem with the deck and what it's doing but for fuck sake i hate time out. It's litterly an extra turn that you have even less chance to interfere with than ice block. Very frustrating card to play against - don't know why blizzard didn't learn from iceblock :// i like the otk  paladin don't get me wrong but that particular card is just straight up bullshit ^^

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Does Blizzard read this?

    Who knows - i don't think so but i think they should. It's not like they should implement the ideas from the community without thinking because there are a lot of trolls in this community i think BUT and this is a huge but. I think they should look into what people complain and what the community would like to see. Some ideas in this community are awesome ! Blizzard and other AAA companies such as bathesda and EA are in a tough spot right now - look at the stockmarket. They are forced to change some things and we saw a nerf comming very fast after the release of RR. Now i can't say this is all connected but perhaps it is. We shall see what the future looks like for hearthstone and i'm not saying it looks bad but they deffinitly should work on some stuff. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Wild Growth and Fiery War Axe nerfs - when cards are class features

    Hmm i'm not sure what the right decisions would have been BUT i think they should have procotions in nerfing such iconic cards. The best way in my oppinions would be to look at an iconic card like wild growth or fiery waraxe and tell the community - we will nerf this card for a 4 weeks priod and look how the class does. They then have 3 options. Nerf it in the way they had it, nerf it in a stronger/weaker way or they see that a class would struggle to much without it as druid right now  and warrior for a long time does.

    They make ajustements so big that the impact of the nerfs are so huge that the meta goes in a absurd different way. And yes the cards that really are the problem where neever adressed. 

    We have two great expaples:

    Wild growth--> spreading plague was nerfed because it was to strong and getting UI at the same time was overkill, then they added cads like branching path and oaken summens after that they put the nail in the coffin with cards like ferocius howl and psychic juicemelone. All these cards except for spreading plague were not touched and instead annihilated a card that was iconic and flavor to the class to its core. 

    FWA--> it was a good card sure but never oppressing until pirates came in to the picture in a big way. So they nerfed smalltime buccaneer. Realizing that piratewarrior is still to powerfull they nerfed FWA and then after they realized oh wow that little shit "i'm in charge now" is to strong they nerfed that. Yes cards like FWA and WG were added in almost all of they decks BUT we see those cards all the time and not oblz

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Enrage warrior

    hey guys i wanted to know if anyone has a good deck in enragewarrior. It seems the arcetype never really worked. Is it a failed archetype that team 5 wants to work ot what is the problem? I would love a great selfdamage warrior but every expansion i try it it never works well:// 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is legend considered a prestigious achievement?

    Hmm depends what kind of deck the opponant plays. If it's a difficult deck than i guess it's a very goood player otherwise i think oh he can just grind - thats all

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How to make DMH warrior viable?

    Dmh is actually very good! You lose against bigpriest but that deck is stupid anyway. I win a lot against evenshaman and almost all other matchups there are decent chances of winning. You have brawls, reckless, sleep with the fishes and warpath. At the end you played yoyr garosh and have 2 dmh, bran, coldlight, bring it on and an execute. When you are at that stage you'll even win against the old non nerfed kingsbane millrogue. So yes everyone sais it's bad because it is a very difficult deck to play but a soon as you get the hang of it the deck is insanely good. Btw you can win against bigpriest but it is very difficult

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What do you think about nerfing fireball ?

    Is nerfing the only thing people know? Has anybody never wanted to buff cards ?? Nerfing inconic cards such as fiery war axe, wild growth and so on is really bad and i acctually hoped blizzard would have stoped witch that after fwa. Put it in hall of fame and replace it right away with a new card but why destroying a iconic key card that defines a class identity - i mean really. 

    How it should be

    Druid = ramp

    hunter = beastsynergy

    Mage=best spells

    rogue = tempo and combokeyword

    warlock=distruption and healthsacrifice for tempo

    priest = best heals

    shaman = totemsynergy and evolve

    paladin = silverhand recruit and divineshield

    warrior = best weapons 

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on MY VISION FOR HEARTHSTONE

    I didn't read all of your post but the inverse hall of fame is suggested by brian kibler in a youtube video about a year ago and there is some benefit to it. BUT if lets say nourish and wildgrowth would be hall of famed and then you get crazy cards in standart because you can print them then the powerlevel in wild would go insane for druid. And no don't say wild is wild because all of it is OP and that is ok. Imo wild. Is in a worse state than standart. There is a 10% cap of powerlevel between the best and the worst class witch means that if you give to many powerful cards or just one insane one the class get's too strong in wild. Right now i see bigpriest and evenshaman all the time. Of corse the nerfs were the reason why rogue and druid are very weak in standart but for a long time now mage and warrior been in the depth in wild witch is a real problem. When a class isn't viable for a few month - that's ok but when a class isn't viable for more then 6month or year then we have a problem because some classes need really good cards in the next expansion. Mage and warrior are very bad in wild so if the cap is to big the classes rely on good cards in expansions. Blizzard still pushing arcetypes like enragewarrior and discardlock. So in wild those cards don't help because that's not what those classes do in wild. Right now althogh standart is a problem with all the hunters lingering around - wild is in an even worse state.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.