Saw a game of Zetalot 2 days ago. He had 4 minions on board and 10 health. Embers where casted, 3 fire balls, Zetalot was dead. So, no, I don't buy your explanation. 3 mana, 24 damage ... No, really ...
No one really cares about this story and your comparisons ... That's also why MTG sucks online, so it's basically nearly dead. They have this mana systems, which is the biggest hurdle and can't be replaced, since it defines the game ... Anyway, bla bla. I mean, I played it for 1,5 years online, I'm done with it.
Of course you can have a little more money than the others, and nothing is wrong with that: enjoy it and play the games you like.
What I wanted to say it's: a game should be around 10-15 €/$ per month, and not the 30-40/month that I for example exceed by far. If I start to pay also for mercenaries (which btw. I wanted to do, but then they released this expansion and nerfed my preferred class into the ground, and made this messed up 1st presentation for mercenaries, that showed clearly, that the human capital in the game is very abysmal at the moment.
First off: Very nice post, solid analysis and results.
Finish off!: It's simple: I remember Blizzard saying that the new system will be clearly better than the old one, it will be great, bla bla, etc. In a very conservative approach to the whole thing: They should simply raise the rewards by 50%, so the systems is exactly this.
In a more radical approach (which I guess it's absolutely unlikely to happen :)): The should do the above, reduce the price for the packets by a half (or even more!) while keeping the cards gotten out of them the same.
But hey, they are obviously greedy f.ckers. It's Activision-Blizzard after all! :)
3
Also nerf: Sif (over 30 damage out of an empty board!) and Brann (restrict it to the next 3 Battlecries, e.g.).
Thanks in advance
P.S.: And while we are at it, Sargeras and maybe Helya?
5
Wow, really guys, you noticed that? Fascinating... Good morning everybody!!!
-1
So they nerfed Holy Nova again. No more face damage ... Really?
-6
Elden Ring? Seriously? The "dodge, attack, dodge, attack, dodge dodge, attack"-Game? I thought it was already dead!!? Wow!
0
Saw a game of Zetalot 2 days ago. He had 4 minions on board and 10 health. Embers where casted, 3 fire balls, Zetalot was dead. So, no, I don't buy your explanation. 3 mana, 24 damage ... No, really ...
0
Hey, dear Hearthpwn-crew, could you tell the guys at Blizzard, that they need to patch the game? At least 8 cards. Thank you!
Bitw. good brawl! Whatever! :D
2
No one really cares about this story and your comparisons ... That's also why MTG sucks online, so it's basically nearly dead. They have this mana systems, which is the biggest hurdle and can't be replaced, since it defines the game ... Anyway, bla bla. I mean, I played it for 1,5 years online, I'm done with it.
Of course you can have a little more money than the others, and nothing is wrong with that: enjoy it and play the games you like.
What I wanted to say it's: a game should be around 10-15 €/$ per month, and not the 30-40/month that I for example exceed by far. If I start to pay also for mercenaries (which btw. I wanted to do, but then they released this expansion and nerfed my preferred class into the ground, and made this messed up 1st presentation for mercenaries, that showed clearly, that the human capital in the game is very abysmal at the moment.
Bla bla ... Why am I even writing this stuff ...
7
So why did you guys and gals didn't revert Illucia to 2 Mana, as she was before, after this hard nerf?
The quality of your decisions is so bad, it's unfathomable.
5
The cards are not revealing and no news on the front page ...
Best information policy ever!
-1
Yep, Tickatus still has to be nerfed and Jaraxxus too ... But Warlock ofc needs some good cards ... It's just not Tickatus and THIS Jaraxxus ...
4
Are you even reading what you are writing? I mean, do you know how you sound ...?
1
First off:
Very nice post, solid analysis and results.
Finish off!:
It's simple: I remember Blizzard saying that the new system will be clearly better than the old one, it will be great, bla bla, etc.
In a very conservative approach to the whole thing: They should simply raise the rewards by 50%, so the systems is exactly this.
In a more radical approach (which I guess it's absolutely unlikely to happen :)): The should do the above, reduce the price for the packets by a half (or even more!) while keeping the cards gotten out of them the same.
But hey, they are obviously greedy f.ckers. It's Activision-Blizzard after all! :)
My 2 cents
0
The only question is: why are they taking american players? European would fit much better :D