Hearthpwn

Does this actually work for you? It's way too hard to dump your entire hand and deck before killing off MechaThun... I played a lot of MechaThun, and I don't see this working...

No idea man :/

Just go Jade...

I dealt a few thousand damage with it: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1322807-jade-brawl-decorating-dalaran

Same here

I like to see all the Rogue fanboys crying like babies...

Just be a little bit honest to yourself, and don't take the nerf as a personal attack against your favorite class.

Preparation was in almoast every single Rogue deck (the same as WildGowth and Nourish for Druid), and it was too powerfull and it also imited the design space for rogue, they could;t really print to powerfull spells for Rogue, because Preparation would make them even more OP.

It was a fair nerf in my point of view....

Quote from Supuhfuzz >>

Salt thread isn't the problem. Smart asses pretending they're contributing to a conversation by redirecting genuine questions to the salt thread - are the problem.

 'Genuine questions' are not redirected to Salt thread... at least I've never seen it happen. Stupid senseless cry-threads are getting redirected (that's what I've seen). People keep opening threads to every single card/class that they lost against, and it really makes this forum a worse place...

Quote from The_Hearthstone_Djinni >>

 Well nerfs are gonna happen either way. So there's nothing wrong with theorizing what they might be.

 

 We know, that they are gonna happen, but we don't need this stupid threads with awful ideas

Hey OP, you missed the thread :)

No problem, but next time please just post your stupid comments here: https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/212005-group-therapy-need-to-blow-off-steam-mega-salty

Thanks

It is a very bad idea, and I'm sure that it is never gonna happen...

First of all, why would blizzard give something for free, that is bringing a shit-ton of money?

Secondly, it would be a middle-finger for ALL old players who Paid/Grinded a lot to get those cards, it would be really unfair...

I'm not speaking from a perspective, where I have all the cards, and I would be jealous on others getting some good gifts. I just think about others at this point. I'm still missing a little bit less than half of the Legendaries and epics, so this would definitely be a win-win for me too, but I don't feel that it is fair... Personally I grinded for more than two years to get to the point where I am right now, and this step from Blizz. would take away all the justified and well earned prize from me, and even more from Old players...

PS: Please stop complaining on other different opinions, only because they are different, try to understand the PROs and CONs... Not like this thread is changing anything for the game... :p Asking that why are a lot of players voting no is the same shit, why you voted yes or other

It sound a really good idea...

BUT

... I don't think the game needs this. As many users already mentioned it, Control "Value" games are meant to be long, and this "Draw" option only applies to Control decks, aggro decks always win/loose early and midrange decks a bit later, but this would not affect them, also Combo decks would not be affected because they either get the combo or not :)

So sadly, this cool idea makes no sense, so will never exist...

I would suggest you to remove Elisia and add MechaThun and instead of the bounce effect a Galvanizer... you are always gonna have 10+ armor as a control warrior, so you can just win these slow matchups with a shieldslam. Also with Doctor Boom's rush you don't always need the 10 armor, and a 10/10 rush can be useful against other decks too.

Quote from Kaladin >>

I think many of us who have problems with netdecking in casual don't have a problem with "netdecking in casual"; we have a problem with the high frequency of netdecks in casual.  

You can't use the argument, "why are you upset about losing in casual, it doesn't affect your rank, just concede and move on," when you have netdecks playing top decks specifically just to get wins.  If winning doesn't matter, why are they  playing netdecks when they could be playing something else?  

No quest has ever asked you to play a top tier netdeck, so that excuse is not valid either.

You can't defend the playing experience and deck choice of netdeckers while simultaneously telling people who don't netdeck that their experience doesn't matter ("who cares if you lose?  just concede.  you can't tell someone else what they can and can't play (but you will lose every game if you yourself don't netdeck)")

Blizzard definitely does pay attention to community feedback. 

The fact that this has gone on for so long and a non zero number of posts is something other than outright celebration and encouragement of casual netdecking shows there is at least some demand and need for an update to this mode (or a new mode entirely).  

IMO if you're still of the opinion that netdecking in casual is totally fine, you either don't play that much casual or you're being willfully ignorant. 

 "No quest has ever asked you to play a top tier netdeck, so that excuse is not valid either." - I'm sorry, but this makes no sense... Why should somebody feel bad for completing his daily quest in casual mode, with he's best deck? And what about newer players, who craft a meta deck but they don't have other cards (I have friends like this)? 

I personally don't play meta decks in casual most of the time, it happens only, when I'm testing a new deck, that I've never played before, and I let my opponent win if he wasn't toxic. I complete my quests in ranked/against friends, but still I feel like, if someone wants to complete he's quest fast, casual is usually perfect for that... and why use a shit deck and play 10 games when you can do the quest in a few games with a better deck?

You need to see both parts... I understand that it is frustrating to play against tier 1 decks in casual, but you need to get used to it... First of all if you want to test your homebrew deck, than it is better to actually see how it works against "Good" decks... if you just want to pull off a stupid combo, than you can play against a friend or the Innkeeper

I guess OP just lost to a warrior... Warrior is not Tier1 now.... just consider that for how long were some classes Tier1 until a nerf hit them.

And ALL the nerfs suggested by OP aree stupid and senseless...

It's just bad RNG... Krip mentioned this too, he opened packs on two accounts and on one he got 9 and on the other only 5...

I hope OP is just a troll... Nobody should be this stupid....

Please stop asking for nerfs for no reason... We have a salt thread, and BTW this is not a Blizzard forum, so even if you are right, you don't accomplish nothing with this shit...

Nice deck :D

Can you post a guide too for players (like me) who never really played mill decks.

Thanks