IMO, Blizzard should be nerfing/buffing cards every two months! (Yes, really ... 2 weeks for the meta to settle and 6 weeks for them to analyze data and target a few of the most/least played cards.)
In WoW, frequent changes are annoying, because it can take several months to experience, learn, and beat new content. In HS, however, the meta takes all of about a week before everybody is playing the same Tier 1 netdecks.
Then im switching to Magic the gathering where you atleast know the value of the cards you buy stays the same.
So not to risk say Shaman becoming unplayable ( Yeah, considering the pletora of broken cards they have - so much so that cards other classes would kill for go simply unused - good luck with that ), better keep the game in a state where 4 classes are unplayed.
I'm not sure I'm following here.
Let me give you an example. Remember when everybody cried about Dr 7? I made a thread saying dont nerf dr boom. Now nobody is crying about it, but it gets to be a powerful awesome card.
If you always nerf the powerful ones, youll end up annoying players like me. Get it?
Nobody is crying about it because it's no longer in standard ?
The only problem I could see arising is that this could possibly be a huge indirect buff to jade decks.
We are getting rid of retardely overpowered deck to let being rolled over by another retardely OP deck, but slightly weaker than one before. One step forward, after long run back...
Something new to cry about! Something new to take us down the road of stupid nerfs that make me regret spending moneys.
So not to risk say Shaman becoming unplayable ( Yeah, considering the pletora of broken cards they have - so much so that cards other classes would kill for go simply unused - good luck with that ), better keep the game in a state where 4 classes are unplayed.
I'm not sure I'm following here.
Let me give you an example. Remember when everybody cried about Dr 7? I made a thread saying dont nerf dr boom. Now nobody is crying about it, but it gets to be a powerful awesome card.
If you always nerf the powerful ones, youll end up annoying players like me. Get it?
0
imo its still a strong card.
1
0
0
2
2
'Just a reminder ;)
4
I got a little story about world of warcraft. They tend to nerf and rebalance all the time, which can be quite annoying.
I remember when they nerfed druid to oblivion making it unplayable - it made me quit.
Now im not crying about nerf of small-time buccaneer, But i just want the game to not go in the direction wow had taken.
This is a friendly reminder for blizzard to only nerf in extreme cases :)
1
Once again the cry baby nerf whiners get their wish fullfilled. If its good nerf it. If its bad leave it bad. Do the math.
I hope blizzard will still only nerf in extreme cases.
I remember when they nerfed druid in wow to oblivion, I quit wow.
2
Where is the dont nerf option?
-3
2
I shouted at the screen today :3
0
Does wild reward chests too or is it only standard rank that counts?
0
I dont think blizzard will introduce flying since Taunt is already too complex for some noobs to understand Kappa
1
I dont think Small-Time Buccaneer is OP. I just think the game lacks control counters like doomsayer.
0
Why isnt Xixo on my friendlist BibleThump