Hearthpwn

I reach legend consistently and having a more heavily RNG based meta doesn't make it a bad meta imo. Just because you perceive the meta as low skill doesn't mean the game doesn't still involve skill. Imo, the perceived quality of the meta is based on two things, according to most posters. The first one mentioned often, as you have, is the amount of RNG versus the amount of skill that goes into winning a game of hearthstone. The other one, mentioned less, is about player agency vs fun factor. Put simply, is the game fun with the amount of viable choices to win a game of hearthstone? 

I personally find the meta to be very boring and stop playing quickly after hitting legend if there are only a couple of decks you can consistently win with. Those types of metas tend to happen when the game is less favorable toward RNG. 

How do I perceive the current meta? Its a bit RNG heavy, but only a couple of classes are underpowered. Its a bit more frustrating winning in this meta, but not nearly as boring as other metas have been.