• 1

    posted a message on is buying classic packs worth

    Is it worth what? 

    Do you need/want those cards? Would you rather have those cards now, as opposed to farming the gold for them? If yes, then it is worth it. If no, then it is not worth it.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Heroic Sapphiron without gvg and naxx

    How do you not have any Naxx cards if you are doing heroic Sapphiron? You had to have unlocked all those cards to get there, no?

    Posted in: Adventures
  • 9

    posted a message on OTK Warrior Meet firelands Portal!
    Quote from HavvkPwn >>

    I don't get this emote when someone is winning, what is it meant to express?

    Nothing, it is simply BM. OP is the reason the sorry emote was replaced.
    OP was just butthurt he sucks in ranked. Needs RNG in casual to get any wins. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Are you sure to concede?

    No. It actually annoys me that everything I do on the computer asks me if I am sure I want to do it. Yes motherfucker, I'm sure. I'm not an idiot.

    It's quality of life (for me) that it doesn't have a confirmation window pop up.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Cancelled challenge when I won, no 80 gold
    Quote from cendol >>
    Quote from jhaybirdsz >>

    Hahaha, I won't mind losing for 80 gold. I just ended my turn and instant 80 gold came. Its even faster than trying to win. Why didn't you just let your friend win in the first place. :D

     It is against my principle to let him/she win without fair fight
     
    Quote from cendol >>
    Quote from Mewen_fr >>

     No. If someone concede then no one receive the price.

    Your friend was just a bit frustrated to lose so he decided to concede in order to prevent you to gain 80 golds.

     how can anyone be so petty?
     
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What's your genuine opinion of Yogg-Saron?

    Now that standard exists, Blizz can make these unique cards. They will cycle out soon enough and never be heard from again. Just embrace the fact that Blizz doesn't want a purely competitive game. They want a "fun" game that has a good share of randomness, where the tables can turn in an instant. 

    I doubt it will even see much play in ranked as the month goes on, at the higher levels at least. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Yogg Stone Rexxar

    Sucks against aggro. Otherwise, it is successful

    Posted in: Yogg Stone Rexxar
  • 1

    posted a message on Have You Heard About Our Lord & Saviour Yogg-Saron? (ARCHIVED)

    I usually hate RNG, but this deck is a lot of fun. Yogg has hurt me as much as helped me, but it is fun none the less

    Posted in: Have You Heard About Our Lord & Saviour Yogg-Saron? (ARCHIVED)
  • 2

    posted a message on Why Didn't Blizzard Nerf Savage Roar?
    Quote from Komorebi3 >>
    Quote from Ibis2k14 >>

    Savage Roar is good if you have a board. Force of Nature created a massive board out of nowhere. Now without the ability to summon 3x charging treant Savage Roar is only a problem if you can't clear your opponent's board, and that's a fair loss.

    Also:

    with 3 minions already on the board: Savage Roar = 8 extra damage (6 from minions, 2 from hero)

    with 3 minions already on the board: Blood Lust = 9 extra damage (all from minions), and Shaman has an hero power that guarantees board presence

    If they nerfed Savage Roar, then they should have nerfed Blood Lust as well because it's the same kind of card. Also, killing Savage Roar would destroy a whole deck archetype (aggro/token Druid) that relies on filling the board Zoo-style, and considering that it's not a very popular deck there was no reason to nerf it.

     This is just wrong. Bloodlust is more than double the cost of Savage Roar, and the shaman HP has a fairly weak board presence to be honest.
    I mean, I agree Savage Roar probably doesn't need a nerf with Naxx and GvG minions rotating out and the nerf to FoN, but saying that Bloodlust is even remotely close in power to Savage Roar is dishonest.
     Bloodlust cost 5, savage roar cost 3. 5 is not more than double 3. Who is being dishonest?
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.