Hearthpwn

Quote from IronJazZ >>

You are Lucky, in 2 games i only got 1 leg (Nefarian)!

Worst one?

Boy am I happy I opened that Prince Taldaram now it's not complete ass anymore!

Hi man, I'm the creator of the other Elemental Shaman on the frontpage. Your deck looks cool! 

I'll definately try it later today +1

1. Make a deck that's interesting
2. Write a small write-up. Really doesn't have to be big, you can expand on it if you deck grabs attention. Don't leave the reader without anything written because that doesn't appeal to us.
3. Have some succes with it. Sure, a Dragon N'zoth Highlander Quest priest sounds cool, but if it plays like shit it doesn't get upvotes
4. I usually put a new deck in my signature. It helps grab attention a little, and shows you're actually proud of your creation.
5. You can try to make a thread about it (in the right forum section!). This helps it get the first ~100 views.

Good luck!

Unfortunately, that's always been like that.

One of the shittiest interactions in the game, if you ask me

Got a Golden Deathwing, Dragonlord from the two free wotog packs! FeelsGŪTman!

Quote from Spartanburg >>

Any idea if this is redeemable for mobile users?

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from Justice171 >>

If you think you're the reason people are playing Razakus Priest and Keleseth Rogue, I'm sorry to break it to you, but you're not.

It seems that you (and a couple others) missed the sarcasm in the first paragraph (followed by the "But seriously..." ) XD  

Though it does take a special type of ego to claim someone didn't do what they said they did, without any proof to the contrary. But to each his own... ;-)

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from Justice171 >>

If I face a druid, I have to see only 1 card to know every card in his deck. If I see a Priest, you can safely assume it's Razakus.

This point, however, I wanted to pick up on. :-)
This is something that I think a lot of people who complain about netdeckers completely miss. The fact that by so many of the same deck being used, it gives a huge advantage to your opponent. They know what your deck does, what cards you are likely to run and what to expect.

This is a big positive towards the idea of netdecking and why it's not such a bad thing - for everyone. :-)

If you think you're the reason people are playing Razakus Priest and Keleseth Rogue, I'm sorry to break it to you, but you're not.

There's nothing wrong with one person netdecking. The reason it's frustrating is that people are doing it en masse. This causes huge staleness in the meta only a couple of days after an expansion launches. If I face a druid, I have to see only 1 card to know every card in his deck. If I see a Priest, you can safely assume it's Razakus. And so on

 Staleness is the problem, Netdecking is what causes it to happen extremely quickly. 

Well, because they are very, very different cards.

Ancestral Spirit allows for your minion to instantly respawn (Earth Elemental mostly), whereas with Spirit Echo, you'd have to replay the minion and overload yourself again. Also, although Doomsayers aren't much in the current meta for some reason, Ancestral Spirit'n your minions on his Doomsayer is pretty, and pardon my Twitch Language, Kreygasm.

You're actually bragging about winning with a top tier netdeck against something that's off meta? Congratulations on your 2 wins. And playing Barnes on curve is almost an instant win with Big Priest, it's the whole point of the deck.  

Hey just went from rank 7 and 2 stars to rank 5 without dropping a game, beat 3 jade druids, razakus priest, ctrl mage, and tempo rogue. 

For people saying the ancestral spirit is bad, there are plenty of good targets to use it on, it doesnt have to be a 2-card combo with earth elemental, you can also use it on Aya, or any big minion to retain tempo (big jades, fire eles, discovered big elementals), it's pretty flexible in the list. 

Thanks a lot for the list.

Yeah I took out both of them because they just didnt work for me. (2x devolve instead of 2 Spirits and 1x Bloodlust instead of 1 Earth-Elemental)

This is a really nice Shamen-Deck (and its not a "meta" deck). At the start I had some problems with it but after some games I figured out, how to play it (ca. 20/5; 80% winrate). I made some changes like bloodlost and devolve instead of Ancestral Spirit. Ty man for that nice Elemental Deck! 

Honestly, unless you have a bad draw or the hunter/ rogue have a nice curve, you have a advantage over them and u shouldn't go 0-4 against them. Pardon me for saying this, the sample size is small and this deck isn't a brain dead deck, you need experience in playing against the different match ups which you lack since u just started trying it. 

ok i won't reply to you anymore but just realize you're amazingly unintentionally entrataining due to your salt, just like i dont know Reynad, or Kripp. Seriously consider being a streamer your stuff is top notch.

I believe his win rate is legit. However, that says nothing about the deck quality. For instance, what was the ranking and the time/date he played the deck and on which server, not to mention actual skill/experience and luck needed to get a win. 

Don't just copy paste a deck and expect to instantly get the same results it advertises. (And that is not only the deck's fault)

My time machine works!!!