• 1

    posted a message on Fractured in Alterac Valley Cinematic Trailer - New Expansion Launches December 7th

    Depends on what they print. 

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Dark Bishop + Seek Guidance

    I tried it and it didn't work :(

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How excited are you for the Darkmoon Faire expansion

    It's about a 4 for me. I've preordered every single expansion but this one I will pass. I am not big on the theme or the mechanics of this expansion. If I were to be honest, the quality of this expansion seems low in comparison to AoO and Scholomance. Also, shadowlands is right around the corner, not to mention cyberpunk. However, the biggest turn off is the recent battle pass. I hate monetization schemes like this. I can't help but feel like a hamster in a wheel. I just can't justify spending money on this game anymore. I hope everyone else has fun with it though. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on My issue with new cards in new expansion.

    My issue with a vast majority of cards in any expansion is that they are underpowered for no reason at all. A bunch of the minions could use a simple stat boost of +1/+1. In addition, whenever blizzard does push a new archtype in a class they trickle in the cards over a couple expansions or even worse they push an archtype with weak niche cards and do not support it at all. (Frost Shaman is a great example) What exactly is the point of this? 70 percent of the cards in an expansion shouldn't be near useless.  This isn't a pack filler rant. It's a design rant. Also, the hearthstone team needs to build the cards concepts first and then the flavor second. Again, a great example is Frost shamam, ton of flavourful ice themed cards but no follow up in the next expansion because it wouldn't be consistent with the Kobolds theme. The cards following an expansion should either build on the groundwork of the previous expansion, or be strong enough where they can stand on their own as new archtypes. You can't add new mechanics for an archtype if you're not going to support them later on. If you do want to introduce a new archtype then the cards better be strong in their own right. Otherwise it's an endless cycle of abandoned ideas. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Next expansion predictions

    I asked Ben if the sack of gold is a clue and he simply liked the post. So hopefully that helps. 

    https://twitter.com/HenockTella/status/893658002099752961

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Should Lord Jaraxxus become a Hero Card?

    Technically speaking yes he should. He does the same thing as a hero card. (Except he adjusts health to 15)

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Druid Legendary Reveal: Tyrantus

    I like the card, jade decks aside I think it'd be a great addition to a more traditional ramp style druid. Also, I'm not sure why people insist on naming cards that directly counter other cards. Yes, Big game hunter and deadly shot are a thing but they are basically non-existent in the meta. Am I missing something, or do people actually think that just because a card has a counter that means it's bad? I've seen this throughout every single minion reveal.  

    Oh well, I like the card and can't wait to play around with it. 

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on New Priest Card - Purify

    Silence Priest maybe? 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 10

    posted a message on New Priest Card - Purify

    Jeeeeez. Hopefully this card is a sleeper. (It aint though...) 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The first two time based mage legendaries with a twist

    I think Eternus should read "Discover a time card" 

    The time cards should read - Turn X - Revert all aspects of the game back to its state on turn X"

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.