Just because you're losing doesn't mean the deck is shit. This is a very hard deck to pilot with a bunch of decision making. This is the kind of deck that the more you play it the more your winrate will improve.
I've been playing it for a few weeks now and I can confirm Shadowverse is a lot more generous than HS. You get around 40 packs right when you start and Cygames usually gives out stuff for free. And the game has very little RNG.
huge rng feast and pay to win model. Welcome 40 pack won't help you vs old player or pay to win player. You will keep loses until rage quit. Unless you spend $500.
I just started playing Shadowverse and man, I'm loving it. Classes feel a lot different from each other, there's more depth to the gameplay than in hearthstone and most importantly, much less RNG.
Well, looking at game logs is not cheating. Deck trackers just provide info that are already on the logs. So using deck trackers is not cheating either.
IF only it was best of three, there would be a chance to get the 12 wins
This confuses me.
Even if you're a good player, you're susceptible to bad rng. In order to have 12 wins, not only do you have to be a good player, but you also have to get lucky.
Of course I'll play it. I don't get why all the hate it's a completely optional mode that last a week and its good rewards are hard to get so it's a perfect option for those that have a job. :)
Hmm i wonder if it has something to do with how the rewards and the amount of money/gold it costs being absolutely fucked up when compared to each other, the absolutely batshit insane difference between 11 and 12 win rewards increasing how luckbased it is to get really good rewards and with how it basically helps no one except those who already have most cards and only harms any f2p wanting to go in.
Nah, probably not.
And how it replaces the tavern brawl for the week, preventing ftp players from getting that sweet free pack...
N'zoth Paladin is actually pretty good against aggro. Drop your doomsayers and clear the board with consecration, pyro or equality when they fill it up. They run out of steam fast. The problem is N'zoth paladin gets shit on by Tempo Mages and Hunters on ladder which are very popular atm.
0
Battletag: GShadow#11206
Region: NA
Trade Only?: Yes
You go first.
0
Just because you're losing doesn't mean the deck is shit. This is a very hard deck to pilot with a bunch of decision making. This is the kind of deck that the more you play it the more your winrate will improve.
1
I've been playing it for a few weeks now and I can confirm Shadowverse is a lot more generous than HS. You get around 40 packs right when you start and Cygames usually gives out stuff for free. And the game has very little RNG.
1
0
I just started playing Shadowverse and man, I'm loving it. Classes feel a lot different from each other, there's more depth to the gameplay than in hearthstone and most importantly, much less RNG.
0
Because they made an obvious effort to make priest bad on standard. Too many people were complaining and saying that playing against priest is unfun.
That necro though.
0
Well, looking at game logs is not cheating. Deck trackers just provide info that are already on the logs. So using deck trackers is not cheating either.
1
N'zoth paladin, Anyfin paladin, control priest, miracle rogue, Midrange Hunter, Renolock... These all have favorable matchup against CW.
0
3
1
0
Brewmaster Hype!!!
3
Surprisingly, it IS played for the taunt because of N'Zoth, the Corruptor.
0
N'zoth Paladin is actually pretty good against aggro. Drop your doomsayers and clear the board with consecration, pyro or equality when they fill it up. They run out of steam fast. The problem is N'zoth paladin gets shit on by Tempo Mages and Hunters on ladder which are very popular atm.
0
What's the purpose of Faceless?