While i agree with alot of peoples gripes about aggro, trust me im not a fan either, as someone who plays many other card games i can tell you that aggro is a very important part of card games. if hearthstone didnt have aggro then everyone would just be focused on high value decks. without aggro only decks that could get the most value out of cards would be viable(i.e Kazakus+brann) because the meta will be slow(can you imagine what else Reno-lock could fit in if it didnt have to tech against aggro?!). And also from a collection standpoint, aggro gives players a chance to be competitive without having access to tons of legendary and epic cards.
I indiscriminately hate aggro decks. But I 100% agree and I think most people do that aggro should exist. The problem isn't aggro its aggro having the highest win rate of any deck, aggro should have the lowest win rate but make up for it with: Lower dust cost, faster games, ability to steal wins (get a god draw vs a bad draw and kill some one VERY early) This allows aggro to be good, but not the best so we see it, just not every game, ect.
0
Done
0
Done
0
Done
0
Done
0
Christonya2#2897
NA
Yes, you go first
Done.
0
Done
0
Done
0
Christonya2#2897
NA
Trade only, you go first.
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade only: Yes, you'll be going first.
Done.
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade: You go first.
Done.
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade: Yes you go first.
Done.
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade, you first.
Done
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade only.
0
Battletag: Christonya2#2897
Region: NA
Trade, you go first.
Done.
8