Bad. Oakheart might pull Dorian instead of a Dragonhatcher.
This could be an issue, not sure if extra LK/hadronox potential outbalances this. It's worth a try, but just wanted to point out that it won't trigger Oakhart since he's a battlecry, would just be a 1/1 right?
I'm happy with the 135 cards they just made for us. No need to make more just for different animations.
Yeah, well I'm actually less than thrilled about the new set but I agree with the sentiment (cards more important) although it would be pretty sweet, and it's not like they don't have the money (cough megabundle cough) :)
What if instead, each hero card that was different to the starting hero had a unique voice line when they start that signals them taking control, so less effort for blizzard and still better flavourwise than having them just randomly turn into another character
Yep, I'm thinking this is the revised version of the suggestion! Waaaay easy to implement, and would just add that little bit of flare:)
'' I would play something OP in my fantasy card game, but it doesn'tmakeany sense, so I won't ''
... wait, what?! First, You take it too seriously. Second, just play with Malfurion if it bugs you that bad ..! ^^
Lunara OP xDD Yeah, I probably do, but there are plenty of others who take it seriously:) it's not like I'm not playing the DK because of this, I just don't want to play the hero that doesn't fit with it:/ I have played with malfurion the whole time, I'm getting bored of 'spectacular' I just want to say 'that was wild!' lol. Also hey, I'm currently running duskfallen aviana in my deck so I can't be taking it that seriously right?:P
I don't know why people react this way to a totally reasonable and cool proposal.
Blizzard earns millions of dollars for this game I don't think that making 10-20 portraits should be that hard. They literally do this shit all the time! And I don't think that the entire team would stop all their work to do this. Cmon!
Personally I'd totally love this change, it would be a great addition to the game even if it doesn't involve gameplay.
I know!! Thank you, voice of reason.. I was just sharing an idea, lol.. So many people here I think are angry antisocial teenyboppers with insecurities so they need to shit on others to feel good about themselves haha. Your thoughts echo my own originally, I thought the amount of work wouldn't be too much for a company like this if we were talking like 10-20 as you say. I agree with others here though that it does become kind of problematic if you go through all the variations:/
Still, I think there being one or two cases where you change thrall > hagatha > deathseer (how often does this happen..) would be better than just everything not making any sense:D
You ask for too much, wouldn't it be better if they worked on the game and new cards instead?
I guess I do, my original idea would be too much. But I think that one guy's suggestion of a voice line would just make it all better..
When you play a Hero card you are assuming the role of a new hero and are no longer the previous one, the current method is fitting
Absolutely correct, think of him coming to replace you. It would be cool though for them to change voice line: "Lunara, now is my turn to take the hand" or something like that
Okay, these two comments are changing my mind. Thanks for reasonable discussion/logic instead of childish namecalling. I think a voice line would be great!
Still, I think there being one or two cases where you change thrall > hagatha > deathseer (how often does this happen..) would be better than just everything not making any sense:D
Hmm, yeah hagatha/dr boom bring in some issues I guess. I'm going to have to think more about this but I'm sure there would be a way to make it work..:/ And to the one question of how it would look, yeah I think it could just change in your gallery depending on which hero you have selected.
For the company to do things like removing ixlid's elemental tag for 'consistency', this seems like it might be a SLIGHT consistency issue, no..? Honestly how hard would it be..
That'd undoubtedly be the coolest change in the history of Hearthstone and all that but, please, keep in mind the HUGE amount of work behind art, voice acting, programming and all of the numerous things I can't think of right now.
Let's not even talk about how they'd have to do that every single time they release a new Hero Portrait or Hero Card. That's way too much extra and, mostly importantly, unnecessary work to ask for, I'm afraid.
Yes, it would be awesome!! And makes so much more sense, than changing characters and even genders entirely. And are you serious? We're talking around 10 new portraits here. That's too much work for a huge company that releases like 130 cards 3 times a year? How often do they release new heroes, not very often at all. It wouldn't be that hard at all imo. I swear people here just like to shit on anyone who suggests anything, for no good reason other than to feel smart?
Hey everyone, so I don't know if this idea has been broached before but a thought just came to me. We need death knights for all the alternate heroes there are. I want to play as Lunara in maly druid and the only reason I don't is because I think it's pretty stupid to turn from Lunara into Malfurion the Pestilent..just how does that make sense?? Hey everyone, I'm medivh or khadgar and now I'm frost lich jaina. I'm nimzy or jaraxxus and now I'm bloodreaver gul'dan. I'm Aleria, now I'm deathstalker rexxar. I'm maiev, now I'm valeera the hollow. etc. etc.. Thoughts? Seems pretty dumb to me. Would be cool if each hero had their own deathknight chararacter.
1
Nice creativity but I had to log in just to post this is the stupidest deck I've ever seen lol
0
This could be an issue, not sure if extra LK/hadronox potential outbalances this. It's worth a try, but just wanted to point out that it won't trigger Oakhart since he's a battlecry, would just be a 1/1 right?
0
Working fine for me EU
0
Yeah, well I'm actually less than thrilled about the new set but I agree with the sentiment (cards more important) although it would be pretty sweet, and it's not like they don't have the money (cough megabundle cough) :)
Yep, I'm thinking this is the revised version of the suggestion! Waaaay easy to implement, and would just add that little bit of flare:)
0
Lunara OP xDD
Yeah, I probably do, but there are plenty of others who take it seriously:) it's not like I'm not playing the DK because of this, I just don't want to play the hero that doesn't fit with it:/
I have played with malfurion the whole time, I'm getting bored of 'spectacular' I just want to say 'that was wild!' lol.
Also hey, I'm currently running duskfallen aviana in my deck so I can't be taking it that seriously right?:P
0
I know!! Thank you, voice of reason.. I was just sharing an idea, lol.. So many people here I think are angry antisocial teenyboppers with insecurities so they need to shit on others to feel good about themselves haha.
Your thoughts echo my own originally, I thought the amount of work wouldn't be too much for a company like this if we were talking like 10-20 as you say. I agree with others here though that it does become kind of problematic if you go through all the variations:/
0
Yeah, good point:)
I guess I do, my original idea would be too much. But I think that one guy's suggestion of a voice line would just make it all better..
1
Okay, these two comments are changing my mind. Thanks for reasonable discussion/logic instead of childish namecalling. I think a voice line would be great!
0
Still, I think there being one or two cases where you change thrall > hagatha > deathseer (how often does this happen..) would be better than just everything not making any sense:D
0
Hmm, yeah hagatha/dr boom bring in some issues I guess. I'm going to have to think more about this but I'm sure there would be a way to make it work..:/
And to the one question of how it would look, yeah I think it could just change in your gallery depending on which hero you have selected.
0
For the company to do things like removing ixlid's elemental tag for 'consistency', this seems like it might be a SLIGHT consistency issue, no..? Honestly how hard would it be..
0
Yes, it would be awesome!! And makes so much more sense, than changing characters and even genders entirely.
And are you serious? We're talking around 10 new portraits here. That's too much work for a huge company that releases like 130 cards 3 times a year? How often do they release new heroes, not very often at all. It wouldn't be that hard at all imo. I swear people here just like to shit on anyone who suggests anything, for no good reason other than to feel smart?
2
Hey everyone, so I don't know if this idea has been broached before but a thought just came to me. We need death knights for all the alternate heroes there are. I want to play as Lunara in maly druid and the only reason I don't is because I think it's pretty stupid to turn from Lunara into Malfurion the Pestilent..just how does that make sense??
Hey everyone, I'm medivh or khadgar and now I'm frost lich jaina. I'm nimzy or jaraxxus and now I'm bloodreaver gul'dan. I'm Aleria, now I'm deathstalker rexxar. I'm maiev, now I'm valeera the hollow. etc. etc..
Thoughts? Seems pretty dumb to me. Would be cool if each hero had their own deathknight chararacter.
0
Pretty sure it always was random man
0
Yeah because the way to teach Blizzard a lesson is to waste my a random's time and my own..