Hearthpwn

I will fucking puke if Reno stays in. Its a completely bullshit card , and is the single most RNG based key card out there. Draw your one copy or get fucked.

Right over your head huh? You do not have to explain why you didn't upvote. Either in defense or offense. We don't need to hear why you didn't. Just don't and silently and politely move on rather than be negative and condescending like you are teaching him a lesson. But good on you for the apology.

hahah this kid is constantly shitting on other peoples decks. Such a trashcan of a person dannywu

How is the view from your high horse up there? do you know how ridiculously childish you sound when you take the time to say no upvotes for you because your are begging for them. What he did, is standard among deck publishers here. Its not unique. On top of that, you have every right to not upvote, but just move along silently after that choice. Typing out no upvotes because you are begging is so ridiculously self righteous and condescending. Real charmer. I wasn't going to upvote simply because It didn't spark a whole lot of interest in me, but now I am simply because of your douchery.

I do not understand why Kun is in this deck=/

Please enlighten me.

Ok so the begining state of these games, in design , is 100% aggro creature combat. It is as design goes deeper that they add things like spells and weapons. At the very base form of the game, its creature combat, which is basically aggro in a nutshell. Aggressive creature based combat is what this game, Magic the Gathering, Elder Scrolls Legends etc all started out as. So everything else is built on that, even if it seems very different. Even if it does not take directly from that , but instead reacts to it.

Attempting to take that philosophy out of the pool of winning philosophies in any given game, would cause other philosophies based around of off of it fail by nature. Hope that clears it up.

You are missing the point. There would be no such thing as control or midrange if it weren't for aggro. The games needs all the archetypes to have the ability to be successful or its stale, boring, and on top of that, it would completely affect other archetypes as they wouldn't need to account for possible aggro. Its not just hearthstone, this has been proven over 20 years by Magic.

Um what? Plenty of people want Aggro, there is a reason theres tons of aggro on ladder.

Taking aggro out of the game would make for a really bad game. There have to be differing archetypes. Controlstone would be uninstallstone.

absolutely not

Infested tauron is only a bonus that it is deathrattle. its not in the for Nzoth but its nice when it happens. Its in because it swaps very profitably with pirates.

Cleave has been ok with pirates but im literally crushing pirates ... just crushing them. 

I figured id make myself a little worse vs pirates to improve my match up vs late game decks.

Sleeping with the fishes literally never went off well for me. I played easily 75 matches without ever having a sleep that I felt was good. So....

Prince has generally been good for me. It doesnt change my whole deck and take many turns to develop like Elise.

It still wins you all the fatigue battles. Its actually a fairly solid body you can work with. And Ive won some pretty amusing battles.

I beat one guy in fatigue with Nat the Dark Fisher lol

Deathwing is really just an emergency button... you could replace it with some other form of late game control. Say Malkorok for example.

Yeah ive changed out battle cry too... ill post changes soon.

Ive never been a fan of Elise tbh, and I cant recall ever losing to it either=( I do think Prince Mal might be ok now

You've hit end turn on turn one before your patches came out and didn't attack?

Im sittin at about 50