I find it funny that the "Sexy cards" art was changed while others remain
4
I find it funny that the "Sexy cards" art was changed while others remain
21
Haha, I mean no offense to you fellow Americans, but your country is turning into a bigger joke everyday. There was literally no harm on those old card arts for years but now since its 2019 and if you show a little bit of cleavage in a game in the US, you are cursed. Even tho girls (even underaged ones) walk almost semi naked this days.
Heck, they even changed the card art iteself LMAO! Thats censorship to the max.
If thats the case, changed every semi naked male hero then, following the "perfect" logic of Blizzard. Oh wait, they are males so its fine, duh.
1
I don't think it is too early to announce new expansion. Next expansion is coming on 6-10th august and normally it is announce around 1-2 week of July. I think that they are a bit lazy and announce a bit later last few expansion (except December one, which is always on Blizzcon 1-2 November). So on theory it is ok to be next expansion. Otherwise we have about 2 weeks more to announce expansion really.
Otherwise I am pretty happy from the state of Hearthstone right now. Last expansion really make the game pretty fresh with a lot of new decks. I am optimistic about next one. Just a quick summarize for me:
1) Token druid,
2)Mech hunter,
3) Agro Hunter
4) Mage on Giants
5) Mech pally
6) Tempo Rogue
7) Pogo Rogue
8) Murloc Shaman
9) Control shaman
10) Zoolock
11) My favorite: control mech warrior
12) Bomb warrior
-7
8 legendarys (3 golden) and tons of dust.... I’m happy with my packs
-2
IS 2257 A PRIME NUMBER?
No, 2257 is not a prime number.
For example, 2257 can be divided by 37: 2257 / 37 = 61.
To be 2257 a prime number, it would have been required that 2257 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
PARITY OF 2257
2257 is an odd number, because it is not evenly divisible by 2.
IS 2257 A PERFECT SQUARE NUMBER?
A number is a perfect square (or a square number) if its square root is an integer; that is to say, it is the product of an integer with itself. Here, the square root of 2257 is about 47.508.
Thus, the square root of 2257 is not an integer, and therefore 2257 is not a square number.
WHAT IS THE SQUARE NUMBER OF 2257?
The square of a number (here 2257) is the result of the product of this number (2257) by itself (i.e., 2257 × 2257); the square of 2257 is sometimes called "raising 2257 to the power 2", or "2257 squared".
The square of 2257 is 5 094 049 because 2257 × 2257 = 22572 = 5 094 049.
As a consequence, 2257 is the square root of 5 094 049.
NUMBER OF DIGITS OF 2257
2257 is a number with 4 digits.
WHAT ARE THE MULTIPLES OF 2257?
The multiples of 2257 are all integers evenly divisible by 2257, that is all numbers such that the remainder of the division by 2257 is zero. There are infinitely many multiples of 2257. The smallest multiples of 2257 are:
0: indeed, 0 is divisible by any natural number, and it is thus a multiple of 2257 too, since 0 × 2257 = 0
2257: indeed, 2257 is a multiple of itself, since 2257 is evenly divisible by 2257 (we have 2257 / 2257 = 1, so the remainder of this division is indeed zero)
4 514: indeed, 4 514 = 2257 × 2
6 771: indeed, 6 771 = 2257 × 3
9 028: indeed, 9 028 = 2257 × 4
11 285: indeed, 11 285 = 2257 × 5
etc.
NUMBERS NEAR 2257
Preceding numbers: …2 255, 2 256
Following numbers: 2 258, 2 259…
NEAREST NUMBERS FROM 2257
Preceding prime number: 2 251
Following prime number: 2 267
TLDR; Thanks to everyone on the HearthPwn team for 2257 days of awesome content, amazing decklists, great forums, addicting pack opening simulators. I'm honored I got to spend at least two years and three months on this platform and I'll think back more than I'd probably care to admit.
Kindest regards,
Cr01s1s.
</header>13
10
5
With the topic of a Barnes nerf popping up in a recent QnA with Blizzard ( https://www.hearthpwn.com/news/6685-rise-of-shadows-developer-q-a-all-answers ) I decided to come up with a possible change to the infamous 4 mana actor.
My change is this: What if instead of summoning a copy of a minion in your deck, Barnes would instead summon a 1/1 actor tok... wait what? You're tired of reading the same copy-and-pasted "original Barnes nerf"? Well good, I am too. That's why I have created a separate, (hopefully) original idea.
My actual change is this: Summon a random minion from your deck. It becomes a 1/1. So instead of summoning a COPY of a minion, Barnes would straight up "recruit" the minion from your deck. (For any of you wondering why I didn't just use the Recruit keyword, Barnes came out during One Night in Karazhan and the Recruit keyword didn't come into the game until Kobolds and Catacombs, which came out over a year later.) For anyone still worried about the 1/1 popping back up from the resurrection pool, the minion that Barnes would summon would permanently be a 1/1 copy. Not even silencing the minion would change it back to its original stats.
So what do you think? Is it brilliant? Is is stupid? How would you nerf Barnes? Feel free to let me know with your response.
11
Greetings. FirePaladin here with another interesting topic to discuss
Today I want to talk about low skill level even on higher ranks of Wild. Something that I havent noticed before. Maybe it has something to do with the new players entering the Wild and making in to higher ranks. Maybe its just degradation. Either way I feel that this is worth disscusion since if more players would actually play better, we wouldn't get so many complaints about everything
As any nother player I enjoy the games where skill actualy matters. The Control vs Control games or Aggro vs Aggro are just satisfying to play when you both have good draws and you both know what you are doing. Apparently this is becoming less and less common
My first thoughts about this came up a long time ago. However, the final trigger was my 2 day journey of playing Big Priest with Vargoth. I was curious about how powerfull it was and if its really superior to Barnes build. Turns out it is. Partly because of Vargoth, and partly because of the stupidity of my enemies. Around rank 5 to rank 3 on EU not a single soul played any tech card or made any good or smart desicion. There was no Saronite Taskmaster, no Tinkmaster Overspark and not even a smart play whatsoever. My Control opponents were immediately killing the Vargoth without a second thought leading to games ending soon because of me ressurecting it again. I've played against Renolocks not playing around Psychic Screams(one of those games resulted me Screaming the board of 11 Kazakus Sheeps and my opponent played Reno on next turn which was inactive.) , Odd Paladins overcomitting on board and Exodia Mages killing my Rag immediatelly. After such an experience I decided to play other decks that there were complaints about. I got the same resulsts with Kingsbane Rogue, Odd Paladin and Mechathunlock. People just weren't good. They were wasting their resources and not planning ahead. Which resulted into their defeat.
So my final thoughts about this are:
1. Before complaining. Try to actually play more carefully and learn from your mistakes.
2. USE THE TECH CARDS. We have a decks in this format that can in late game completely lock you out of game (NoFunAllowed Shamanwock,Weasel Priest,Quest Mage) and yet they can be disrupted. As any deck ever. Use your card collection
3. Play better and you will be rewarded. Yes, even in a such and RNG game like hearthstone.
EDIT: As I see by a few responses: Please before posting some hate post think actually about the topic. The Big Priest is just an example and as I said.: People were terrible against playing Kinsgbane Rogue and Mechathunlock as well. Its not only about Big Priest. Its about majority of players that are whining yet playing like a rank 50 Standard)
15
Wait!
Wait!
HOLD THE F****ING TRAIN!
Did he just... separate his finger from his hand? How did he do that??
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
4
Took this deck, took out the oracle and both lookouts and added another molten and two murloc warleaders. First try on turn 6
7
Eater of secrets gives you the "Well met indeed" achievement
-1
18 packs; two legendaries. Both Elise :(
2
Well this was unexpected. Neat effect though.
2
His hero power adds up quick.
3
It means they will "come back for a limited time"