What about the people who spent money or dust to get those cards and then they can't use them for a month? Tough luck bud your enjoyment of the game is less important than mine?
I think people that say having a ban list in Wild is counter productive have never played in Wild when it was dominated by one deck to the point where you could not even play anything else. Star Aligner Druid is a great example. There was a time when Druid was so strong if you queued anything else, you lost. Is that healthy for wild?
I play almost exclusively Wild and have for many years. I don't want bans at all. The whole point of it is to be able to play with whatever I want and the same for my opponents. I don't want to remake my decks or not be able to play the cards I want periodically. That's just an annoyance. It's Wild after all. And just so we're clear I'm not playing Priest, Druid, or Warlock decks in Wild.
Besides, it's not like they are stopping printing cards which will change the format. Your idea of what is healthy is not what it means for other players. If you want top have some semblance of that then that's what Standard is for.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
What about the people who spent money or dust to get those cards and then they can't use them for a month? Tough luck bud your enjoyment of the game is less important than mine?
I play almost exclusively Wild and have for many years. I don't want bans at all. The whole point of it is to be able to play with whatever I want and the same for my opponents. I don't want to remake my decks or not be able to play the cards I want periodically. That's just an annoyance. It's Wild after all. And just so we're clear I'm not playing Priest, Druid, or Warlock decks in Wild.
Besides, it's not like they are stopping printing cards which will change the format. Your idea of what is healthy is not what it means for other players. If you want top have some semblance of that then that's what Standard is for.