You are entitled to your own opinion, but I think that majority of players wouldn't agree with you. Priest's and Warrior's strategy is to sit down, remove every threat and heal / armor up until fatigue, while Warlock at least has some pro-active win conditions (Jaraxxus, Tickatus, Envoy) and (unlike Priest with tons of random generation) he has to manage his resources to survive. I'm not saying he's harder to play or anything, but I'm sure that he's more interesting for most people.
Anytime anyone says "most people," they are talking about "me, myself, and I." Because you honestly have no idea what most people think unless you have commissioned a survey of thousands of Hearthstone players.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Anytime anyone says "most people," they are talking about "me, myself, and I." Because you honestly have no idea what most people think unless you have commissioned a survey of thousands of Hearthstone players.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
You mean control warrior?
But yes, both decks are mediocre (warrior being slightly worse).
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
You obviously haven't played much Control Warrior, then. It's good against aggro decks, Priest and Miracle Rogue, and that's about it.
Overall, the win rate for Control Warrior is much lower than Control Warlock.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland