Blizzard came out to say they would try to work towards preserving class identity. Just because they make that statement does not mean that they are forced to lock themselves into ONLY making cards that help this drive. Also, the understood clause on CLASS identity are cards existing in, designed for, and printed for a class. Zephrys was printed in neutral. This accomplished the previous design goal, and offers a new mechanic that only an online card game could use. The revolutionary aspect of this card alone is just brilliant. I do know that you don't hate the card, but I have to say I don't think this card ever gets adjusted and I think your reasoning in support of potential change for it is flawed.
My defense towards your statement is the fact that the card does have potential to answer weaknesses that classes have. However, I do believe that the wall behind when you can effectively play the card is fine. Yes it feels bad when your opponent gets "the answer", but part of that answer is dictated by the way you choose to play. According to HS Replay data, he is not even played in 3 of 5 top rated decks. Of the decks he is played in, he has a losing winrate in 1 and a semi-average in highlander hunter. This information doesn't tell me in the slightest that we need to be worried.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Blizzard came out to say they would try to work towards preserving class identity. Just because they make that statement does not mean that they are forced to lock themselves into ONLY making cards that help this drive. Also, the understood clause on CLASS identity are cards existing in, designed for, and printed for a class. Zephrys was printed in neutral. This accomplished the previous design goal, and offers a new mechanic that only an online card game could use. The revolutionary aspect of this card alone is just brilliant. I do know that you don't hate the card, but I have to say I don't think this card ever gets adjusted and I think your reasoning in support of potential change for it is flawed.
My defense towards your statement is the fact that the card does have potential to answer weaknesses that classes have. However, I do believe that the wall behind when you can effectively play the card is fine. Yes it feels bad when your opponent gets "the answer", but part of that answer is dictated by the way you choose to play. According to HS Replay data, he is not even played in 3 of 5 top rated decks. Of the decks he is played in, he has a losing winrate in 1 and a semi-average in highlander hunter. This information doesn't tell me in the slightest that we need to be worried.