Yet another poll. I previously made a poll on how much skill patron warrior takes (you can find it here), turns out most people think it takes a high amount of skill. This time around the poll is if it's OP or not. Defining "overpowered" is a bit hard, so you can comprehend it as you like, but if it needs a nerf, its overpowered and if it does not, it is not OP. I've also included the option of waiting till TGT to see if TGT affects Grim Patron in any way before rolling out the nerfs.
Also, if you think it is op, give the reason down below, and if you want, describe which card should be nerfed.
I'd like to see the average rank of people who complain about this. When I play patron at lower ranks it's just a massacre, people have no idea what to do, but at higher ranks people are teched against the deck and they know how to play against it so it feels much worse.
Plus overall now it seems people are better against the deck. You can actually do something against patron warrior, unlike old miracle rogue. That deck was just "can I kill him before he stealths an auctioneer?". There was very few things that could get that. Brawl, auchenai+circle, shadowflame, flamestrike.. yah that's about it. Maybe spellpower lightning storm but good luck.
The meta also seems worse for patron. More handlocks, more control warriors, more mages with flamestrike ( even mech and tempo mage ) and more freeze mage. Tons of deck playing Harrison jones too.
I never thought Patron was worthy of nerfing anyway. It's really hard to play, anyone who doesn't think so probably doesn't play the deck. It's about as hard to play as control priest or grinder mage.
Yet another poll. I previously made a poll on how much skill patron warrior takes (you can find it here), turns out most people think it takes a high amount of skill. This time around the poll is if it's OP or not. Defining "overpowered" is a bit hard, so you can comprehend it as you like, but if it needs a nerf, its overpowered and if it does not, it is not OP. I've also included the option of waiting till TGT to see if TGT affects Grim Patron in any way before rolling out the nerfs.
Also, if you think it is op, give the reason down below, and if you want, describe which card should be nerfed.
I've never found it to be OP - I actually do WAY better vs Grim then I did vs control. Personally I love the change.
Friend me @Anasko#1102 |
================================================
I'd like to see the average rank of people who complain about this.
When I play patron at lower ranks it's just a massacre, people have no idea what to do, but at higher ranks people are teched against the deck and they know how to play against it so it feels much worse.
Plus overall now it seems people are better against the deck. You can actually do something against patron warrior, unlike old miracle rogue. That deck was just "can I kill him before he stealths an auctioneer?". There was very few things that could get that. Brawl, auchenai+circle, shadowflame, flamestrike.. yah that's about it. Maybe spellpower lightning storm but good luck.
The meta also seems worse for patron. More handlocks, more control warriors, more mages with flamestrike ( even mech and tempo mage ) and more freeze mage. Tons of deck playing Harrison jones too.
I never thought Patron was worthy of nerfing anyway. It's really hard to play, anyone who doesn't think so probably doesn't play the deck. It's about as hard to play as control priest or grinder mage.
Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice - Sneak Review! http://www.thepoxbox.com/challenges.php?id=batmanvsuperman
Lots of threads about this already. Use the search function. Locked.