As title, feel Hearthstone should double the gained every 3 wins from Rank 5 to Legend to make up for no bonus stars. Or at least some additional gold incentive somewhere, if double gold gain(20g for 3wins instead of 10g) is too much. It's a huge grind once the bonus stars are gone and little incentive to keep going especially if Legend card back has already been achieved previously.
It will encourage the casuals to aim for Rank 5 at least - play more, and those at Rank 5 to also play more since they get a little more gold? When people play more its good for the game?
Not that the gold means much, I still get a thrill buying and opening new packs, but end up mostly getting 40 dust worth of cards. ;p
People who need gold are usually the ones who find it hard to reach rank 5 in the first place without Hunter or Zoo (talking about the F2Pers). More gold for winning = more aggro decks. It would be nice for Blizzard to give more gold but not at the the expense of other players' fun.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"When you only have good cards in your deck, there is no such thing as topdecking"- Sean "Day9" Plott
Given that there is such a long distance between rank 20 and rank 1, and absolutely no reward at any point along the journey, I think it's very reasonable that there should be something in there. Double gold per win from rank 5? Sure. There's still the 100 gold cap, and 20 gold per 3 wins is still a small amount compared to daily quest rewards.
Wouldnt it be a better idea to rewards those that hit legend by giving them x2 gold from wins During the month they hit it. ? This way u have a reason to grind to legend not just rank 5
As title, feel Hearthstone should double the gained every 3 wins from Rank 5 to Legend to make up for no bonus stars. Or at least some additional gold incentive somewhere, if double gold gain(20g for 3wins instead of 10g) is too much. It's a huge grind once the bonus stars are gone and little incentive to keep going especially if Legend card back has already been achieved previously.
Thoughts?
Reaching Legend status isn't supposed to be easy. If they did what you're saying it would be devalued as a real accomplishment.
Before every game I pray to little baby RNGesus
I don't see how. You'd still have to win the same number of games. You'd just get more gold for winning those games.
It will encourage the casuals to aim for Rank 5 at least - play more, and those at Rank 5 to also play more since they get a little more gold? When people play more its good for the game?
Not that the gold means much, I still get a thrill buying and opening new packs, but end up mostly getting 40 dust worth of cards. ;p
People who need gold are usually the ones who find it hard to reach rank 5 in the first place without Hunter or Zoo (talking about the F2Pers). More gold for winning = more aggro decks. It would be nice for Blizzard to give more gold but not at the the expense of other players' fun.
"When you only have good cards in your deck, there is no such thing as topdecking"- Sean "Day9" Plott
Given that there is such a long distance between rank 20 and rank 1, and absolutely no reward at any point along the journey, I think it's very reasonable that there should be something in there. Double gold per win from rank 5? Sure. There's still the 100 gold cap, and 20 gold per 3 wins is still a small amount compared to daily quest rewards.
Wouldnt it be a better idea to rewards those that hit legend by giving them x2 gold from wins During the month they hit it. ? This way u have a reason to grind to legend not just rank 5