I tried some new Control decks since the nerfs hit the strongest aggro decks and made Cubelock little bit weaker and literally my first few games were against these pesty Quest Rogues and the probably worst thing ever since Exodia Mage, called Shudderwock Shaman. This brought me back to my Aggro Druid just because playing against these 2 decks fells just awful (also pretty much auto concede as Control).
What do u guys think? I was hyped for more Control vs. Control matches but i guess some ppl just don't want to have fun.
Also why are so many happy about Shudderwock Shaman? It's literally a more annoying but less consistent Exodia Mage copy. I know there a many who really like this Class (no idea why tho) and wanted a strong deck but why not even Shaman instead?
it definitely feels like control decks have particularly brutal counters right now. you have like a 5-10% chance to win against combo or anti-control decks, whereas aggro decks still have easily a 30-40% chance against you. a well-timed dirty rat or strategic healing could win these matchups previously. but now there's simply no counterplay, other than control lock hoping to rush out a rin. witchwood needed to have included some reasonable combo-breaking mechanic.
Blizzard literally forces us to play Aggro... Just to be able to interact with pesty Quest Rogues and Shudderwock Shamis. Would like to play Control Decks since that's my favorite decks but i just get tilted when i have to auto concede against these 2 decks.
it definitely feels like control decks have particularly brutal counters right now. you have like a 5-10% chance to win against combo or anti-control decks, whereas aggro decks still have easily a 30-40% chance against you. a well-timed dirty rat or strategic healing could win these matchups previously. but now there's simply no counterplay, other than control lock hoping to rush out a rin. witchwood needed to have included some reasonable combo-breaking mechanic.
First legitimate complaint i have heard about witchwood. I feel that a dirty rat like mechanic would fix alot of the problems.
To be honest im not to mad that shudderwock shaman is a thing. I dont play it but you do understand how terrible of a spot shaman has been in for so long? I think its been close to a year since they had a viable competitive deck? Let the shaman players release their rage that has been building for so long now.
We play decent control decks making thoughtful plays taking our time to wrap up a 15 to 20min deserved win only to wash away that time to concede on turn 1 cause Q Rogue is op as before vs control and shaman by turn 7 or so u can already see that its a shudderwock deck. Gg.
Murloc pally and odd rogue are the way to go cause auto conceding any match is the worst game design in the history of games. Aggro is the underdog vs lets say a Controlock but ive won many matches cause of a well timed silence and a bit of bad draws from opponent so its not impossible to win. But control deck vs a quest rogue is a turn 1 concede and shudderwock is a close second.
Why? Blizzard cmon i dont like playing aggro but i also like to win so fix ur game! !!!! Nerf quest rogue!!!@
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Hello,
I tried some new Control decks since the nerfs hit the strongest aggro decks and made Cubelock little bit weaker and literally my first few games were against these pesty Quest Rogues and the probably worst thing ever since Exodia Mage, called Shudderwock Shaman. This brought me back to my Aggro Druid just because playing against these 2 decks fells just awful (also pretty much auto concede as Control).
What do u guys think? I was hyped for more Control vs. Control matches but i guess some ppl just don't want to have fun.
Also why are so many happy about Shudderwock Shaman? It's literally a more annoying but less consistent Exodia Mage copy. I know there a many who really like this Class (no idea why tho) and wanted a strong deck but why not even Shaman instead?
it definitely feels like control decks have particularly brutal counters right now. you have like a 5-10% chance to win against combo or anti-control decks, whereas aggro decks still have easily a 30-40% chance against you.
a well-timed dirty rat or strategic healing could win these matchups previously. but now there's simply no counterplay, other than control lock hoping to rush out a rin. witchwood needed to have included some reasonable combo-breaking mechanic.
Blizzard literally forces us to play Aggro... Just to be able to interact with pesty Quest Rogues and Shudderwock Shamis. Would like to play Control Decks since that's my favorite decks but i just get tilted when i have to auto concede against these 2 decks.
To be honest im not to mad that shudderwock shaman is a thing. I dont play it but you do understand how terrible of a spot shaman has been in for so long? I think its been close to a year since they had a viable competitive deck? Let the shaman players release their rage that has been building for so long now.
We play decent control decks making thoughtful plays taking our time to wrap up a 15 to 20min deserved win only to wash away that time to concede on turn 1 cause Q Rogue is op as before vs control and shaman by turn 7 or so u can already see that its a shudderwock deck. Gg.
Murloc pally and odd rogue are the way to go cause auto conceding any match is the worst game design in the history of games. Aggro is the underdog vs lets say a Controlock but ive won many matches cause of a well timed silence and a bit of bad draws from opponent so its not impossible to win. But control deck vs a quest rogue is a turn 1 concede and shudderwock is a close second.
Why? Blizzard cmon i dont like playing aggro but i also like to win so fix ur game! !!!! Nerf quest rogue!!!@