Hearthpwn

Most of the hunter in this meta is midrange, face hunter is a tier 3 deck. Pirate warrior is tier 3 as well, the only tier 2 aggro deck is Aggro token druid.

eh, if's there's a lot of aggro I'll just run burn mage lol

mispost

Quote from KKoolis >>

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Quote from snipeninja1 >>

Quote from memecian >>

 

 Aggro is pretty much skillless cancer. That's not something inherently wrong with the archetype, that's Blizzards fault.

And both keleseth and zoo are borderline aggro, althought granted: to play them well you need some degree of skill (keleseth more than zoo)

 You confuse me very much sir. Very much. You have 3k posts here, you've been a member since 2015 and have lots of medals. This means you've been playing the game for a long while. And yet, your statement is something i'd expect to hear from a kid who started playing the game a couple of months ago and feels sad it's precious deck loses. No offence but seriously, how can you even say that?!

First of all and hopefully to end this ******** arguement, aggro decks are not "blizzard's fault" and neither a problematic archetype. Aggro decks have been part of TCG and CCG since their birth. MtG which is the father of this kind of games has had aggro decks since day 1. No, it's not a stupid way to play, it's just another way to play. You consider yourself a smart guy for playing control decks? This is downright cringeworthy. Anyone can play anything after he netdecks it and practices with it. You think Razakus or Jade Druid or Mill Warrior are mentally challenging? Really? OK.

Second of all, HearthStone is P2W for most people, no matter how hard you guys try to deny it. If you have any responsibilities, you can't afford to tirelessly grind the game daily just for a CHANCE to open something you like. Sometimes you get lucky but, it's never enough to build some of the heavy-weight control decks you consider to be "for smart players only". Therefore, you need to pay, and even then, you are not guaranteed shit, you are just making your chances a little better. Without aggro in the game, HearthStone loses it's bulk of f2p players. Without aggro in the game, there is no game.

And when it comes to what is trully cancer, aggro beats you up ideally by turn 5-6 or it lost, which means you either lose fast and get to play another game or win. It's also countered by lots of tech cards, depending the deck. On the other hand, decks like Razakus, Jade etc. have ZERO interaction with the enemy and take an age. You basically have to sit there and watch your opponent slowly moving towards the win without interacting at all. But hey, that's the fun of the game right? Not some aggro deck lulz.

Get your thoughts together and think for yourself instead of copy-pasting noob theories. With all that time on your back you should be above that....