Hearthpwn

Quote from ninju12 >>

Whats ETC>

Firstly he does not need a buff, secondly he would need almost a complete rework because it's harder to make changes to such a limited mana cost.

Quote from Buxton800 >>

I could only see this working for cards that have been rotated out of standard, where the packs are no longer available to purchase, that way Blizzard won't loose out on money and free cards from new accounts wouldn't be an issue.

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Quote from Mister_Mage >>

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Too easy to complete a collection that way..

You got duplicated epic? Great now trade for another player with duplicated epic (300 free dust)

Same for legendaries.. Also many players might be scammed like.. Trading 1 golden legendary for 2 legendaries could mean the other player might not trade the 2nd one and just get ton of value.. Can easily be abused, takes the fun of collecting.. Bad idea.

 All valid points but you can only trade one card at a time.

 You agreed with a player to trade 1 golden boom for 2 useful legendaries, the player trades golden boom for say n'zoth, and then instead of trading say.. Sylvannas for owl he dissapears.. So player with golden boom got scammed.

Quote from Blue_Banana_whotookthisname >>

Quote from Mister_Mage >>

Quote from EmmettChan >>

You could fix it by only being able to trade cards of the same rarity.

 Smart but what about when it comes to golden cards

What do you mean? The same thing. Only a common for a common, a rare for a rare, or a golden common for a golden common.

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Too easy to complete a collection that way..

You got duplicated epic? Great now trade for another player with duplicated epic (300 free dust)

Same for legendaries.. Also many players might be scammed like.. Trading 1 golden legendary for 2 legendaries could mean the other player might not trade the 2nd one and just get ton of value.. Can easily be abused, takes the fun of collecting.. Bad idea.

Quote from EmmettChan >>

You could fix it by only being able to trade cards of the same rarity.

Ben Brode and I both feel its too confusing for new players it has 21 hero's which is too hard to understand just think we could barely handle 18 deck slots ;)

Quote from Komorebi3 >>

Except every new account basically gets loads of free cards, so people would just farm new accounts to trade the good cards they get with the random bad commons their main account has in spades.

Howdy MisterMage here with a new concept for Hearthstone! Ever felt there must be something better to do with your extra copies of cards or just cards you don't want (besides just disenchanting them of course)? Well with this system trade them in for cards you don't have with other players. This could be built into the collection, you and your opponent could both select a card and if both players approve of the trade they officially switch collections (Basic cards would not be 'Tradable'). You could trade with friends or just publicly with anyone. I'm sure there's many ways this could  benefit new players and more experienced ones alike (along with that some cons). but who knows maybe some players are feeling generous... you might just get Deathwing for a Wisp!

I see what your getting at but that's the point of the word basic.

Very cool cards I can see you put a lot of time into them! Maybe for justicar the proto-bots could have a random spare part applied to them when summoned I don't now about the upgrade half of it though. Also flavor text for Kaboom could be- "a goblins favorite sound".

In you're case yes, but she can be quite fun I play her in my astral communion Druid and evolve shaman 

Quote from Zukuu >>

Quote from Lathy >>

I like Mana Stone better than Soul Burn. Flavor wise, it's great, but I think it's a bit to similar to cards made the week you won.  I'd probably go with something else. Usually, you have better ideas (hopefully, that didn't came out wrong) ;)

 After taking the critique to heart, I looked at the database again and I think I came up with something pretty unique.

Based upon the unit "Spirit Walker" and its ability "Spirit Link": Links 4 units together in a chain. All units with Spirit Link on them will live longer, by distributing 50% of the damage they take across other Spirit Linked units.

http://classic.battle.net/war3/orc/units/spiritwalker.shtml

However, I'm not sure if the effect is clear: You target another minion and both share their health. e.g. if you target a Northshire Cleric, BOTH minions would have 7 health. If one is pinged, BOTH would have 6 health left. If either dies, the other is destroyed as well.

This gives both minions more survivability, since you can now for instance attack a 5/3 minoion and live through it. Since the damage is essentially "split", you also have more targets that can be healed (making AoE heals like Circle of Healing also more powerful). Lastly, you can theoretically target an enemy minion and then sacrifice the minion to destroy it, or give it taunt and let your opponent destroy it.

Thoughts? Is it an interesting card? Balanced? Wwould a 2/4 for 3 mana be better? Is it clear? Would "share" be a better word to use perhaps (although "link" is more flavorful seeing the name of the ability)?

I have to agree with you but it's hard not to when you open a golden Bgh