• 1

    posted a message on Your favorite game of all time?
    Quote from onceupop >>

    Sex Games on the Commodore 64

     

    Posted in: Other Games
  • 2

    posted a message on Voracious Reader Miracle Priest Deck Guide

    I am having great fun with this! As someone says - I have no idea what I am doing, but somehow I usually win :) 

    Thank you Gatormatthew_, you are a gentleman and a scholar.

    Posted in: Voracious Reader Miracle Priest Deck Guide
  • 1

    posted a message on Everything is rigged!
    Quote from Poghy >>
    Quote from LandT >>
    Quote from Poghy >>

    Playing as black is fine, it just requires a more reactive playstyle. So as a controi player, I prefer black.

    I know that the data at ChessReplay.com shows that white has a better winrate, but that is because the whitetard aggro players dont know how to play reactive and there is also a lot of auto-conceding against white. So aggro white is better at lower ranks, but in top 100 legend the game is pretty balanced.

     Any replacement for bishop (♗) ? Had to dust him for golden queen.

     There is no replacement, but there is a way for F2P players. If you can reach 8th rank with one of your pawns, you can promote it to bishop.

    I know its not optimal, but you shouldnt disenchant anything if you are a F2P player. And dont craft anything in golden, its a feature for the P2W whales.

     My opponents always get Queen from pawn on 8th, obviously rigged?

    And when they will fix that spaghetti code 'en passant'?

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Everything is rigged!
    Quote from Poghy >>

    Playing as black is fine, it just requires a more reactive playstyle. So as a controi player, I prefer black.

    I know that the data at ChessReplay.com shows that white has a better winrate, but that is because the whitetard aggro players dont know how to play reactive and there is also a lot of auto-conceding against white. So aggro white is better at lower ranks, but in top 100 legend the game is pretty balanced.

     Any replacement for bishop (♗) ? Had to dust him for golden queen.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on people who defend blizzard greed

    My God, this whole thread is so "First world problem" meme. 

    Meanwhile people in Africa be like:

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on You people deserve sweet f all - Opinion on the community
    Quote from 30Roman >>

    First of all, everybody is complaining, not only free to play!

     I am not complaining. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 21

    posted a message on New Shaman Epic Card Revealed - Magicfin

    And give divine shield to all outcast elementals you discarded (corrupt: give stealth too).

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Since hearthstone has given up the gold economy, are f2p players now unable to compete in standard?
    Quote from user-31021151 >>

    So it's pretty much confirmed at this point, they're taking away our gold.

     'our gold'? Stalin approves. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard already ruined Duels
    Quote from Kedalin >>
    Quote from Dr_Scaphandre >>
    Quote from SilverBlooD >>

    HS player base is filled with damn crybabys. If you hate mode that much, don't play it and don't ruin experience of other players, who want to play. If you hate game that much, leave the damn game.

     I have to play it because of the god damn Legendary Quests. I thought I was done after the first one but then a second one immediately popped up.

     There's a third one after that!

     

    Posted in: Duels
  • 3

    posted a message on 99% certain
    Quote from PewPewPiew >>

    The type of deck you play determines your opponent when climbing ladder. For example add a swamp ooze or a kobold stickyfinger and or even a wyrmrest purifier to your deck and you won't get warriors anymore for 50 games only 1 warrior and without them for 50 games 12 warriors. 

     

     

     Use your newly found knowledge to your benefit, manipulate your matchmaking and climb to the top of the ladder. Profit!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The RNG mechanism isn't really Random?
    Quote from DeathDragon >>
    Quote from Lintu107 >>

    For example number generator in Java language heavily (more than 10 times) favoured "0", when generating integers from any range.

     What?!? No.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on [Bug] or Blizzard Greediness (???)

    I think golden and non-golden versions count as different cards, so the situation you described is possible. Also, you can open nerfed cards and disenchant them for full refund (if applicable), IF you didn't DE them already earlier. 

    I am not sure on all of this and I am too lazy to Google it :(

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Devolving missles bugged?

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Madame Lazul
    Quote from PewPewPiew >>
    Quote from Horrorwolf >>

     

    I agree with the main topic writer, no one should look at the other players hand. It is a card game.

     I do not understand this statement? It is Blizzard's game, they can make whatever they want with their game. "You cannot look into other players hand because it is a card game" is not guaranteed human right enforced by charter of the United nations.

    So the way I see it, it is simple - deal with it, or play some other game that suits you more...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on For everyone who was crying about how amazing Glide was pre-launch and how it needed to be nerfed immediately...

    Damn, I see Glide still oppresses the ladder. They should nerf this card already, before it completely destroys the game.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.